What do systematic reviews say?

Case management vs usual care

• Disease management interventions for heart failure 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  11 studies · 2369 participants
  Low

INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care

• Intensive case management for severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  24 studies · 3595 participants
  Low

INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care

Intensive Case Management showed no clear difference in adverse event: 1b. Death ‐ suicide ‐ by long term compared with standard care (low certainty).

• Intensive case management for severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.68 [0.31, 1.51]
  9 studies · 1456 participants
  Low

INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Intensive case management for severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care

Intensive Case Management may leads to lower global state: 1. Leaving the study early ‐ by long term compared with standard care (low certainty).

• Intensive case management for severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.68 [0.58, 0.79]
  13 studies · 1798 participants
  Low

INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether intensive Case Management changes social functioning: 2. Employment status (various measurements) ‐ by… compared with standard care (very low certainty).

• Intensive case management for severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.7 [0.49, 1]
  4 studies · 1129 participants
  Very low

INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Intensive case management for severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty

Case management for integrated care showed no clear difference in mortality compared with usual care of older people living with frailty (low certainty).

• Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.98 [0.84, 1.15]
  14 studies · 9924 participants
  Low

Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty

Case management for integrated care showed no clear difference in change in place of residence to a nursing or residential home compared with usual care of older people living with frailty (low certainty).

• Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.73 [0.53, 1.01]
  4 studies · 1108 participants
  Low

Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty

• Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  11 studies · 9284 participants
  Low

Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty

• Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 592 participants
  Low

Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty

• Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  16 studies · 10652 participants
  Low

Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty

Case management for integrated care showed no clear difference in change in healthcare utilisation (hospital admissions) compared with usual care of older people living with frailty (moderate certainty).

• Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.91 [0.79, 1.05]
  5 studies · 2424 participants
  Moderate

Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty

• Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  14 studies · 8486 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: integrated community case management changes any iCCM illness compared with usual facility services (very low certainty).

• Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.96 [0.77, 1.19]
  5898 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services plus CCM

• Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services plus CCM

• Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services

• Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services

• Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services

Summary of findings: integrated community case management showed no clear difference in neonatal mortality rate compared with usual facility services (low certainty).

• Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 1.01 [0.77, 1.33]
  65209 participants
  Low