Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services: Neonatal mortality
Summary of findings: integrated community case management showed no clear difference in neonatal mortality rate compared with usual facility services (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: integrated community case management vs usual facility services Neonatal mortality rate · children U5 Summary of findings: integrated community case management showed no clear difference in neonatal mortality rate compared with usual facility services (low certainty). Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | HR 1.01 [0.77, 1.33] | 65209 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.