Intervention not reported
Duration of reulceration episodes · people with healed venous leg ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1995 participantsGRADE not reported
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
695 questions · 728 findings · 63 reviews · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 219 · 30.1%GRADE not reported 55 · 7.6%Very low 194 · 26.6%Low 136 · 18.7%Moderate 90 · 12.4%High 34 · 4.7%
Intervention not reported
Ulceration on the contralateral leg · people with healed venous leg ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1995 participantsGRADE not reported
EU class 3 compression hosiery vs no compression stockings
Ulceration on the contralateral leg · people with healed venous leg ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2000 participantsGRADE not reported
EU class 1 compression hosiery vs EU class 2 compression hosiery
Reulceration · people with healed venous leg ulcers
EU class 1 compression hosiery showed no clear difference in reulceration compared with EU class 2 compression hosiery (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.7 [0.67, 4.32]1 study · 99 participantsLow
EU class 1 compression hosiery vs EU class 2 compression hosiery
Duration of reulceration episodes · people with healed venous leg ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2014 participantsGRADE not reported
Transvaginal biological graft vs native tissue repair
Visceral injury · vaginal prolapse
Transvaginal biological graft showed no clear difference in visceral injury compared with native tissue repair (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.34 [0.04, 3.26]2 studies · 254 participantsLow
Any transvaginal permanent mesh vs native tissue repair
Visceral injury · vaginal prolapse
Transvaginal permanent mesh may leads to higher visceral injury compared with native tissue repair (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 3.67 [1.63, 8.28]14 studies · 1997 participantsLow
Laparoscopic hysterectomy vs vaginal hysterectomy
Intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
Laparoscopic hysterectomy showed no clear difference in intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) compared with vaginal hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 0.93 [0.37, 2.33]10 studies · 1237 participantsLow
Robotic hysterectomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy
Intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Single‐port laparoscopic hysterectomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy
Intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
It is very uncertain whether single‐port laparoscopic hysterectomy changes intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 3.51 [0.14, 89.42]1 study · 64 participantsVery low
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs laparoscopic‐assisted vaginal hysterectomy
Intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy showed no clear difference in intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) compared with laparoscopic‐assisted vaginal hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 0.72 [0.06, 8.27]2 studies · 161 participantsLow
V‐NOTES vs laparoscopic hysterectomy
Intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
V‐NOTES showed no clear difference in intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 3.09 [0.12, 78.41]2 studies · 96 participantsLow
Vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy
Intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) compared with abdominal hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 1.62 [0.52, 4.99]7 studies · 697 participantsLow
Laparoscopic hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy
Intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
Laparoscopic hysterectomy showed no clear difference in intra‐operative visceral injury(dichotomous) compared with abdominal hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 1.68 [0.88, 3.22]15 studies · 2298 participantsLow
Vaginal procedure vs sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse)
Intraoperative Visceral injury · women with apical vaginal vault prolapse
Vaginal procedure showed no clear difference in intraoperative Visceral injury compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.46 [0.13, 1.63]7 studies · 625 participantsModerate
Absorbable vs non‐absorbable sutures
Bladder injury · women with apical vaginal prolapse
Absorbable showed no clear difference in visceral injury ‐ Bladder compared with non absorbable sutures (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.43 [0.11, 1.65]3 studies · 545 participantsModerate
Intervention not reported
Case control ‐ ulcerative colitis, MMR · children 9 months to 15 years old
The intervention showed no clear difference in case control ‐ ulcerative colitis, MMR (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in children 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 1.35 [0.81, 2.23]2 studies · 292 participantsModerate
Antibiotics vs placebo or no treatment
Infected episiotomy/laceration (superficial perineal wound infection) № of participants: 3420 (1 RCT) · Women undergoing operative vaginal delivery
Any antibiotics leads to lower infected episiotomy/laceration (superficial perineal wound… compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.53 [0.4, 0.69]Studies not reportedHigh
Antibiotics vs placebo or no treatment
Infected episiotomy/laceration (deep perineal wound infection № of participants: 3420 (1 RCT) · Women undergoing operative vaginal delivery
Any antibiotics leads to lower infected episiotomy/laceration (deep perineal wound infection № of… compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.46 [0.31, 0.69]Studies not reportedHigh
Antibiotics vs placebo or no treatment
Infected episiotomy/laceration (organ or space infection) № of participants: 3420 (1 RCT) · Women undergoing operative vaginal delivery
Any antibiotics showed no clear difference in infected episiotomy/laceration (organ or space infection) № of… compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.11 [0.01, 2.05]Studies not reportedLow