Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults
Comparison 3: MBT leads to lower repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults
It is very uncertain whether newer generation antidepressants (NGAs) changes repetition of SH by post‐intervention (NGA class)№ of participants:… compared with placebo (very low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
OR 0.59 [0.29, 1.19]
Studies not reported
Very low
OR 0.67 [0.18, 2.41]
Studies not reported
Very low
OR 0.55 [0.24, 1.29]
Studies not reported
Low
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults
Antipsychotics may leads to lower repetition of SH by post‐intervention№ of participants: 30(1 RCT) compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.09 [0.02, 0.5]
Studies not reported
Low
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults
Antipsychotics showed no clear difference in repetition of SH by post‐intervention№ of participants: 53(1 RCT) compared with another comparator drug or dose (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.51 [0.5, 4.58]
Studies not reported
Low
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults
It is very uncertain whether mood stabilisers, including antiepileptics and lithium changes repetition of SH by post‐intervention№ of participants: 167(1 RCT) compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.99 [0.33, 2.95]
Studies not reported
Very low
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults
Natural products showed no clear difference in repetition of SH by post‐intervention№ of participants: 49(1 RCT) compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.33 [0.38, 4.62]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Change in BCVA from baseline to 6‐month · People with lamellar macular holes
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Change in metamorphopsia from baseline to 6‐month · People with lamellar macular holes
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Change in anatomical outcomes (CRT) from baseline to 6‐month · People with lamellar macular holes
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Retinal sensitivity · People with lamellar macular holes
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Vision‐related quality of life · People with lamellar macular holes
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Adverse outcomes · People with lamellar macular holes
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Â
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Suicidal ideation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Suicidal behaviour
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Anxiety
1 finding from 1 review
Depression
1 finding from 1 review
Mental health and well‐being: stress or stress perceptionMeasured by: investigators measured stress or stress perception using different instruments; lower scores mean lower stress or stress perception Timing of outcome assessment: post‐intervention
1 finding from 1 review
Stress 1 month
1 finding from 1 review
Burnout
1 finding from 1 review