What do systematic reviews say?

Intervention not reported

• Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  65 studies · 2446 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  38 studies · 1263 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 279 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  17 studies · 896 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes serious adverse events for all placebos compared with wait‐list or… (very low certainty).

• Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  11 studies · 517 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

The intervention probably leads to higher invitation versus control: uptake of screening (moderate certainty).

• Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.71 [1.49, 1.96]
  24 studies · 141391 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes GP invitation letter versus invitation letter from other authority… (very low certainty).

• Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.69 [0.75, 3.82]
  2 studies · 86 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

The intervention may leads to higher personal invitation versus invitation letter: uptake of screening (low certainty).

• Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.32 [1.11, 1.56]
  5 studies · 27663 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

The intervention probably leads to higher letter with fixed appointment versus letter with open invitation to… (moderate certainty).

• Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.61 [1.48, 1.75]
  5 studies · 5742 participants
  Moderate

Intervention not reported

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes counselling versus control: uptake of screening (very low certainty).

• Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.23 [1.04, 1.45]
  2 studies · 393 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes counselling versus other: uptake of screening (very low certainty).

• Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.13 [0.9, 1.41]
  1 study · 208 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

The intervention may leads to higher education versus control: uptake of screening (low certainty).

• Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.35 [1.18, 1.54]
  13 studies · 63415 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2500 participants
  Very low

Prism adaptation training vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Prism adaptation training vs control

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes neglect outcomes: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty).

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.28
  5 studies · 154 participants
  Very low

Prism adaptation training vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

NIBS vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

NIBS vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

NIBS vs control

It is very uncertain whether NIBS changes neglect outcomes: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty).

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.75
  10 studies · 244 participants
  Very low

NIBS vs control

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 24 participants
  GRADE not reported