Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,554 questions in 140 reviews · Heart

current versions
No studies 272 · 17.5%Ungraded 44 · 2.8%Very low 329 · 21.2%Low 464 · 29.9%Moderate 319 · 20.5%High 126 · 8.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Higher vs lower omega‐6: primary outcomes
Cardiovascular mortality Study duration range 24‐96 months Omega‐6 dose range 2.8%‐24.5% E · adults with or without existing CVD
Omega‐6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.76, 1.55]7 studies · 4019 participantsVery low
Higher vs lower omega‐6: primary outcomes
Cardiovascular events: any Study duration range 12‐96 months Omega‐6 dose range 2.8%‐24.5% E · adults with or without existing CVD
Omega‐6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.81, 1.15]7 studies · 4962 participantsLow
Higher vs lower omega‐6: primary outcomes
CHD events: myocardial infarction (fatal or non‐fatal) or angina Study duration range 12‐96 months Omega‐6 dose range 2.8%‐24.5% E · adults with or without existing CVD
Omega‐6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.66, 1.17]7 studies · 3997 participantsVery low
Higher vs lower omega‐6: primary outcomes
MACCEs Study duration range 24‐96 months Omega‐6 dose range 2.8%‐12.0% E · adults with or without existing CVD
Omega‐6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.59, 1.2]2 studies · 2879 participantsVery low
Higher vs lower omega‐6: primary outcomes
Stroke: fatal or non‐fatal Study duration range 24‐96 months Omega‐6 dose range 2.8%‐21.9% E · adults with or without existing CVD
Omega‐6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [0.45, 4.11]4 studies · 3730 participantsVery low
Higher vs lower omega‐6: additional key outcomes
MI Study duration range 12‐96 months Omega‐6 dose range 2.8%‐24.5% E · adults with or without existing CVD
Omega‐6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.76, 1.02]7 studies · 4606 participantsLow
Higher vs lower omega‐6: additional key outcomes
Serum TC Study duration range 12‐96 months Omega‐6 dose range 2.0%‐24.5% E · adults with or without existing CVD
Omega‐6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 4280 participantsHigh
Higher vs lower omega‐6: additional key outcomes
Serum TG Study duration range 12‐72 months Omega‐6 dose range 2.0%‐15.0% E · adults with or without existing CVD
Omega‐6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 834 participantsLow
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation vs usual care
Mortality due to all causes ‐ not reported · people with implantable ventricular assist devices
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for people with implantable ventricular assist devices (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation vs usual care
Mortality due to cardiovascular event ‐ not reported · people with implantable ventricular assist devices
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for people with implantable ventricular assist devices (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation vs usual care
Rehospitalisation due to cardiovascular event ‐ not reported · people with implantable ventricular assist devices
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for people with implantable ventricular assist devices (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation vs usual care
Serious adverse events: infection · people with implantable ventricular assist devices
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for people with implantable ventricular assist devices (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation vs usual care
Health‐related quality of life · people with implantable ventricular assist devices
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for people with implantable ventricular assist devices (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 37 participantsVery low
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation vs usual care
Heart transplantation ‐ not reported · people with implantable ventricular assist devices
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for people with implantable ventricular assist devices (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation vs usual care
Cost ‐ not reported · people with implantable ventricular assist devices
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for people with implantable ventricular assist devices (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Transradial vs transfemoral approach
Short‐term NACE · people with coronary artery disease undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary… (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.61, 0.94]4 studies · 17133 participantsModerate
Transradial vs transfemoral approach
Short‐term cardiac death · people with coronary artery disease undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary… (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.54, 0.88]11 studies · 11170 participantsModerate
Transradial vs transfemoral approach
Short‐term MI · people with coronary artery disease undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary… (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.81, 1.02]11 studies · 19430 participantsHigh
Transradial vs transfemoral approach
Success of the procedure · people with coronary artery disease undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary… (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.96, 0.98]28 studies · 25920 participantsModerate
Transradial vs transfemoral approach
Short‐term all‐cause mortality · people with coronary artery disease undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary… (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.62, 0.95]10 studies · 18955 participantsHigh
Transradial vs transfemoral approach
Bleeding · people with coronary artery disease undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary… (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.54 [0.4, 0.74]20 studies · 23043 participantsLow
Transradial vs transfemoral approach
Access site complications · people with coronary artery disease undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary… (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.36 [0.22, 0.59]24 studies · 16112 participantsLow
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
All‐cause mortality · people with or without existing CVD, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.89, 1.07]24 studies · 19290 participantsModerate
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Adiposity ‐ BMI, kg/m2 · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 4798 participantsLow
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Serum total cholesterol (TC, mmol/L) · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted27 studies · 8072 participantsHigh
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Serum fasting triglyceride (TG, mmol/L) · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted20 studies · 3905 participantsModerate
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Serum high‐density lipoprotein (HDL, mmol/L) · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted18 studies · 4674 participantsModerate
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Serum low‐density lipoprotein (LDL, mmol/L) · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted15 studies · 3362 participantsModerate
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Coronary heart disease events · people with or without existing CVD, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.72, 1.06]15 studies · 10076 participantsModerate
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Stroke · people with or without existing CVD, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.58, 1.44]11 studies · 14742 participantsLow
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events · people with or without existing CVD, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.59, 1.2]2 studies · 2879 participantsVery low
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Cardiovascular mortality · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.82, 1.26]16 studies · 15107 participantsLow
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Cardiovascular events · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.79, 1.01]21 studies · 17799 participantsModerate
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Coronary heart disease mortality · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.78, 1.06]9 studies · 8810 participantsLow
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Atrial fibrillation and arrhythmias · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.72, 1.06]11 studies · 11692 participantsVery low
Higher polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vs lower PUFA
Adiposity ‐ body weight, kg · people with or without existing cardiovascular disease, men and women
Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted13 studies · 7100 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) · people with cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease
Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality events (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.9, 0.98]10 studies · 21727 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All‐cause mortality · people with cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease
Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality events (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.91, 1.05]8 studies · 21222 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Myocardial infarction (non‐fatal) · people with cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease
Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality events (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.81, 0.95]6 studies · 21145 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Stroke (non‐fatal) · people with cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease
Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality events (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.71, 0.97]6 studies · 21205 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Cardiovascular mortality · people with cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease
Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality events (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.89, 1.12]6 studies · 19457 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Adverse events ‐ hepatopathy · people with cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease
Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality events (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [0.96, 1.35]4 studies · 20687 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Adverse events ‐ myopathy · people with cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease
Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality events (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.31 [0.72, 2.38]3 studies · 20581 participantsVery low
ICD plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone
Outcomes length of · people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Implantable cardiac defibrillators for people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ICD plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone
All‐cause mortality (HR) ‐ main analysisa 16.5 to 67.6 months · people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Implantable cardiac defibrillators for people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.78 [0.66, 0.92]6 studies · 3128 participantsHigh
ICD plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone
Cardiovascular mortality (RR)b 22.8 to 67.6 months · people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Implantable cardiac defibrillators for people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.46, 1.21]4 studies · 1781 participantsModerate
ICD plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone
Sudden cardiac death (HR)a 24 to 67.6 months · people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Implantable cardiac defibrillators for people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2018) · Cochrane
HR 0.45 [0.29, 0.7]3 studies · 1677 participantsHigh
ICD plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone
Adverse events 67.7 months · people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Implantable cardiac defibrillators for people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1116 participantsModerate
ICD plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone
Noncardiovascular mortality (RR)b 22.8 to 67.6 months · people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Implantable cardiac defibrillators for people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.81, 1.68]4 studies · 1781 participantsModerate
ICD plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone
Health‐related quality of life 24 to 29 months · people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Implantable cardiac defibrillators for people with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 561 participantsModerate