Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,783 questions · 10,022 findings · 882 reviews

No studies found 2,100 · 21%GRADE not reported 1,013 · 10.1%Very low 2,237 · 22.3%Low 2,514 · 25.1%Moderate 1,709 · 17.1%High 449 · 4.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Laser therapy vs other treatments

Incidence and severity of treatment‐related adverse effects ‐ fractional CO2 laser versus verapamil ‐ charring ‐ keloid scars ‐ · participants with hypertrophic and keloid scars

It is very uncertain whether laser therapy changes incidence and severity of treatment‐related adverse effects ‐… compared with other treatments (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laser therapy vs no treatment

Scar severity assessed by health professionals · participants with hypertrophic and keloid scars

It is very uncertain whether laser therapy changes scar severity ‐ Non‐Ablative Fractional Laser (NAFL) versus no… compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laser therapy vs no treatment

Scar severity ‐ NAFL versus no treatment ‐ patient global assessment measured on a VAS ranging from 0 to 100 mm (0 = as normal skin and 100 = worst possible scar) ‐ hypertrophic scars ‐ · participants with hypertrophic and keloid scars
1 finding from 1 review

Laser therapy vs no treatment

Incidence and severity of treatment‐related adverse effects ‐ NAFL versus no treatment ‐ scar worsening ‐ hypertrophic scars ‐ · participants with hypertrophic and keloid scars

It is very uncertain whether laser therapy changes incidence and severity of treatment‐related adverse effects ‐ NAFL… compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laser therapy vs no treatment

Incidence and severity of treatment‐related adverse effects ‐ NAFL versus no treatment ‐ hyperpigmentation ‐ hypertrophic scars ‐ · participants with hypertrophic and keloid scars

It is very uncertain whether laser therapy changes incidence and severity of treatment‐related adverse effects ‐ NAFL… compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sclerotherapy vs no intervention

All‐cause mortality · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

It is very uncertain whether sclerotherapy changes all‐cause mortality compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sclerotherapy vs no intervention

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

It is very uncertain whether sclerotherapy changes upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sclerotherapy vs no intervention

Serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of congestive hypertensive gastropathy · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

It is very uncertain whether sclerotherapy changes serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sclerotherapy vs no intervention

Serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of gastric varices · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

It is very uncertain whether sclerotherapy changes serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sclerotherapy vs no intervention

Serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of bleeding from gastric varices · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

It is very uncertain whether sclerotherapy changes serious adverse events and liver‐related morbidity: incidence of… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sclerotherapy vs no intervention

Oesophageal variceal bleeding · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

It is very uncertain whether sclerotherapy changes oesophageal variceal bleeding compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care vs electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care

Global state: clinically important change in global state · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care changes global state: clinically important change assessed by: number of… compared with electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care vs electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care

Adverse effects: clinically important adverse effectsassessed by: number of participants with a delayed memory deficitStudy duration: 4 weeks · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care changes adverse effects: clinically important adverse effectsassessed by:… compared with electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care vs electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care

Dropout · people with the acute phase of schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether magnetic seizure therapy plus standard care changes leaving the study early: any reasonassessed by: number of dropouts… compared with electroconvulsive therapy plus standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review