Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,695 questions · 4,979 findings · 433 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 998 · 20%GRADE not reported 1,140 · 22.9%Very low 1,024 · 20.6%Low 1,029 · 20.7%Moderate 636 · 12.8%High 152 · 3.1%

Intervention not reported

IL‐6 · people with CKD requiring dialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 62 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Serum potassium · people with CKD requiring dialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 357 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Serum phosphate · people with CKD requiring dialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 403 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Serum albumin (end of intervention) · people with CKD requiring dialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
14 studies · 715 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Serum prealbumin · people with CKD requiring dialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 225 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Death · people with CKD requiring dialysis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Intolerance to therapy ‐ Gastrointestinal intolerance · people with CKD requiring dialysis

The intervention showed no clear difference in intolerance to therapy ‐ Gastrointestinal intolerance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.81 [0.58, 13.65]
6 studies · 426 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Weight · people with CKD requiring dialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 365 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Body mass index · people with CKD requiring dialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 368 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Triceps skinfold thickness · people with CKD requiring dialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 367 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Mid‐arm circumference · people with CKD requiring dialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral protein‐based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 97 participants
Very low

Vitamin D vs placebo or no intervention

Linear growth (length/height) Unit: cm Time frame: 3 months · children under 5 years of age

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 240 participants
Low

Vitamin D (higher dose) vs vitamin D (lower dose)

Stuntingc · children under 5 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Vitamin D (higher dose) vs vitamin D (lower dose)

Adverse effect: hypercalciuria As defined by trialists Time frame: 3 months · children under 5 years of age

Vitamin D (higher dose) showed no clear difference in adverse effect: hypercalciuria As defined by trialists Time frame:… compared with vitamin D (lower dose) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.16 [1, 1.35]
6 studies · 554 participants
Low

Vitamin D (higher dose) vs vitamin D (lower dose)

Hypercalcaemia · children under 5 years of age

Vitamin D (higher dose) showed no clear difference in adverse effect: hypercalcaemia As defined by trialists Time frame:… compared with vitamin D (lower dose) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.39 [0.89, 2.18]
5 studies · 986 participants
Low

Vitamin D (higher dose) vs vitamin D (lower dose)

Adverse effect: hyperphosphataemiac · children under 5 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Vitamin D (higher dose) vs vitamin D (lower dose)

Adverse effect: kidney stonesb · children under 5 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Vitamin D (higher dose) + micronutrient(s) vs vitamin D (lower dose) + micronutrient(s)

Linear growth (length/height) Unit: cm Time frame: 3 months · children under 5 years of age

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Low

Vitamin D (higher dose) + micronutrient(s) vs vitamin D (lower dose) + micronutrient(s)

Mean height‐for‐age z‐score · children under 5 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Vitamin D (higher dose) + micronutrient(s) vs vitamin D (lower dose) + micronutrient(s)

Stuntingb · children under 5 years of age

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found