Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,534 questions · 5,247 findings · 456 reviews

No studies found 1,142 · 21.8%GRADE not reported 1,503 · 28.6%Very low 1,040 · 19.8%Low 869 · 16.6%Moderate 554 · 10.6%High 139 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Intervention not reported

Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better · participants aged 18‐60 years with myopia ranging in severity up to 12 diopters (D)

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better · participants aged 18‐60 years with myopia ranging in severity up to 12 diopters (D)

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Proportion of participants who lost two or more lines of best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) · participants aged 18‐60 years with myopia ranging in severity up to 12 diopters (D)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Eyes within ± 0.5 D of target refraction · participants aged 18‐60 years with myopia ranging in severity up to 12 diopters (D)

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes eyes within ± 0.5 D of target refraction (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High‐dose methylphenidate vs placebo

Inattention Measured using SNAP‐IV inattention subscale (range 0 to 27) · Children aged 6 to 18 years with ASD
2 findings from 1 review