Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,721 questions · 19,640 findings · 2,039 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 3,754 · 19.1%GRADE not reported 1,273 · 6.5%Very low 4,859 · 24.7%Low 5,568 · 28.4%Moderate 3,240 · 16.5%High 946 · 4.8%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control

Falls · Older people living in the community

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions showed no clear difference in rate of falls (falls per person‐years) compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control

Number of people who experienced one or more falls · Older people living in the community

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions showed no clear difference in number of people who experienced 1 or more falls compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Two per cent CHG vs alcohol hand sanitiser (61% alcohol and emollients)

Incidence of bacteriologically confirmed infection (types of infection as specified by study authors) within the first 28 days of life ‐ all infections · Neonates and caregivers

Two per cent CHG probably leads to lower incidence of bacteriologically confirmed infections (types of… compared with alcohol hand sanitiser (61% alcohol and emollients) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alcohol‐based handrub vs usual care

Incidence of (study author‐defined) suspected infection within the first 28 days of life · Neonates and caregivers

It is very uncertain whether alcohol‐based handrub changes incidence of suspected infections (author‐defined) within the first… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Four per cent chlorhexidine + hand hygiene promotion vs usual care

Authors reported adverse outcomes (events without hospitalisation) · Neonates and caregivers

It is very uncertain whether four per cent chlorhexidine + hand hygiene promotion changes authors reported adverse outcomes (events without hospitalisation) compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Non‐randomized studies** · adults and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Non‐randomized studies** · adults and children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review