Cochrane · systematic review · CD013328

Interventions to improve sanitation for preventing diarrhoea

Bauza, V, Ye, W, Liao, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Infectious DiseasesAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
16
current version
GRADE rated
8
No studies
8
Included studies
NR
No studies 8 · 50%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 6.3%Low 6 · 37.5%Moderate 1 · 6.3%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table 1

Population: adults and children
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Cluster‐RCTs
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Diarrhoea prevalence (All ages)
RR 0.89 [0.73, 1.08]7 studies · 40129 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Diarrhoea prevalence (Children < 5)
RR 0.98 [0.83, 1.16]4 studies · 16215 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Non‐randomized studies**
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table 2

Population: adults and children
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Cluster‐RCTs
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Diarrhoea prevalence (Children < 5a)
RR 0.85 [0.69, 1.06]3 studies · 14900 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness
Non‐randomized studies**
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Diarrhoea prevalence (All ages)
RR 0.61 [0.5, 0.74]23 studies · 117639 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Diarrhoea prevalence (Children < 5)
RR 0.64 [0.43, 0.96]9 studies · 8453 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency

Summary of findings table 3

Population: adults and children
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Cluster‐RCTs
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Diarrhoea prevalence (Children < 5a)
RR 0.82 [0.69, 0.98]7 studies · 28909 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
NRCTs
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings table 4

Population: adults and children
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Cluster‐RCTs
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Diarrhoea prevalence (All ages)
RR 0.85 [0.76, 0.95]17 studies · 83938 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Diarrhoea prevalence (Children < 5)
RR 0.87 [0.77, 0.97]14 studies · 60024 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Non‐randomized studies**
no estimate extractedNRNo studies