Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,050 questions in 42 reviews · Incontinence

current versions
No studies 391 · 37.2%Ungraded 82 · 7.8%Very low 199 · 19%Low 206 · 19.6%Moderate 150 · 14.3%High 22 · 2.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Decreasing fluids vs increasing fluids
Cure rates by symptom quantification (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Weight loss vs control
Improvement rates by patient observation (all UI types) · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.4 [1.14, 1.71]1 study · 304 participantsLow
Decreasing fluids vs increasing fluids
Improvement rates by symptom quantification (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Decreasing fluids vs increasing fluids
Incontinent episodes per week (all UI types) · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 125 participantsVery low
Caffeine reduction vs control
Cure rates by patient observation (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Caffeine reduction vs control
Improvement rates by patient observation (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Caffeine reduction vs control
Condition‐specific quality of life ICIQ Overactive Bladder Symptoms Quality of Life. Scale from: 25 to 160. Better quality of life indicated by lower values. · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 11 participantsVery low
Caffeine reduction vs control
Adverse effects ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Caffeine reduction vs control
Cure rates by symptom quantification (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Caffeine reduction vs control
Improvement rates by symptom quantification (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Caffeine reduction vs control
Incontinent episodes per day (all UI types) · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 74 participantsVery low
Lifestyle weight loss vs metformin weight loss
Cure rates by patient observation (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Weight loss vs control
Condition‐specific quality of life Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Scale from: 0 to 400. Better quality of life indicated by lower values. · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsLow
Lifestyle weight loss vs metformin weight loss
Improvement rates by patient observation (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Lifestyle weight loss vs metformin weight loss
Condition‐specific quality of life ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Lifestyle weight loss vs metformin weight loss
Adverse effects ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Lifestyle weight loss vs metformin weight loss
Cure rates by symptom quantification (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Lifestyle weight loss vs metformin weight loss
Improvement rates by symptom quantification (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Lifestyle weight loss vs metformin weight loss
Prevalence of weekly UI (all UI types) · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.79 [0.7, 0.9]1 study · 1294 participantsVery low
Weight loss vs control
Adverse effects · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Weight loss vs control
Cure rates by symptom quantification (all UI types) · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.91, 1.37]1 study · 738 participantsLow
Weight loss vs control
Improvement rates by symptom quantification (all UI type) · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.21 [1.02, 1.44]2 studies · 1032 participantsLow
Weight loss vs control
Prevalence of weekly UI (all UI type) · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.78, 1]1 study · 2739 participantsVery low
Soy‐rich diet vs control
Cure rates by patient observation (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Soy‐rich diet vs control
Improvement rates by patient observation (all UI types) ‐ not reported · adults with urinary incontinence
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs suprapubic catheterisation
Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.61, 1.69]5 studies · 575 participantsVery low
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Ease of use for participants ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Quality of life ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Cost utility analysis ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · patients with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.67 [0.68, 4.1]1 study · 72 participantsLow
Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Asymptomatic bacteruria · patients with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Number of patients with pain · patients with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 72 participantsVery low
Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Ease of use for participants ‐ not reported · patients with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Quality of life ‐ not reported · patients with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Cost utility analysis ‐ not reported · patients with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs suprapubic catheterisation
Asymptomatic bacteruria · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 2.25 [1.63, 3.1]19 studies · 2316 participantsVery low
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs suprapubic catheterisation
Number of participants with pain · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 5.62 [3.31, 9.55]4 studies · 535 participantsLow
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs suprapubic catheterisation
Ease of use for participants ‐ not reported · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs suprapubic catheterisation
Quality of life ‐ not reported · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs suprapubic catheterisation
Cost utility analysis ‐ not reported · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 162 participantsVery low
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Asymptomatic bacteruria · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.04143 studies · 1610 participantsVery low
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation
Number of patients with pain ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation vs no treatment/sham treatment
Participant‐reported measures: number of women reporting UI symptoms · women with symptomatic UI
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation vs no treatment/sham treatment
Serious adverse events · women with symptomatic UI
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 173 participantsLow
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation vs no treatment/sham treatment
Disease‐specific quality of life: number of women with an I‐QOL score improvement ≥ 10 points at 12 months · women with symptomatic UI
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.77, 1.62]1 study · 142 participantsLow
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation vs no treatment/sham treatment
Repeat continence surgery: number of women undergoing repeat continence surgery · women with symptomatic UI
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation vs no treatment/sham treatment
Other adverse event: pain/dysuria: dysuria · women with symptomatic UI
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
RR 5.73 [0.75, 43.7]1 study · 173 participantsLow
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation vs no treatment/sham treatment
Other adverse event: (new) detrusor overactivity: overactive bladder symptoms · women with symptomatic UI
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [0.63, 2.93]1 study · 173 participantsLow
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation vs no treatment/sham treatment
Other adverse event: urinary tract infection · women with symptomatic UI
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.24, 3.86]1 study · 173 participantsLow