Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
Ankylos Plus (Dentsply) implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with seven (Sweden & Martina) implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
SPI Element sand-blasted acid-etched standard implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with SPI Element SurfLink-modified implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
ITI SLA titanium screws showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with southern blasted/etched titanium screws; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
Astra TiO2-blasted titanium screws showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with branemark turned titanium screws; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
MegaGen EZ Plus blasted standard implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with megaGen EZ Plus calcium-incorporated (Xpeed) implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
Branemark Mark IV turned titanium implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with branemark Mark IV TiUnite oxidised implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
NobelActive internal connection implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with nobelReplace implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
NobelReplace Select Tapered implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with nobelReplace Groovy implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
NobelActive external connection implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with nobelReplace implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
NobelActive internal connection implants led to lower marginal bone level change compared with nobel Speedy Groovy external connection implants; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Immediate loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with early loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD -0.06 [-0.16, 0.03]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Occlusal loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with non-occlusal loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD 0.03 [-0.10, 0.15]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Patients who have had radiotherapy and who have missing teeth that require replacement with osseointegrated dental implants
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Immediate loading led to lower marginal bone level changes compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD -0.10 [-0.20, -0.01]
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Early loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD -0.04 [-0.15, 0.07]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Partially edentulous patients receiving posterior mandibular implants
Subepithelial connective tissue graft (palate) at implant placement showed no clear difference in peri-implant marginal bone level change compared with no augmentation; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Alveolar bone height · Partially edentulous patients with a distal-extension RDP (minor connector); cross-over
1 finding from 1 review
Prosthesis survival and crestal bone loss (5 years) · Patients with tooth/implant-supported FDPs; split-mouth
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · People with dental implants
Flapless implant placement showed no clear difference in peri-implant marginal bone level change compared with conventional flap elevation; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Alveolar bone level · Patients with single-tooth implants receiving implant crowns; split-mouth
1 finding from 1 review