Faces Pain Scale score at 4 weeks' post ‐injury (0 to 10: greatest pain) · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Subjective knee score ‐ KOOS‐4 score (mean score of 4 components) at 2 years: score from 0 (extreme symptoms) to 100 (no symptoms) · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events (such as donor site morbidity, failure of graft including re‐rupture) at 2 years · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Treatment failure (graft rupture or ACL reconstruction) at 2 years5 · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
The intervention may leads to lower treatment failure (graft rupture or ACL reconstruction) at 2 years5 (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Treatment failure (meniscal surgery) at 5 years5,7 · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
The intervention showed no clear difference in treatment failure (meniscal surgery) at 5 years5,7 (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
General health‐related quality of life: SF‐36 physical component score (range 0 to 100; higher score = better health state) at 2 years · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Return to activity or level of sport at 2 years · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
The intervention showed no clear difference in return to activity or level of sport at 2 years (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Osteoarthritis at 5 years · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes osteoarthritis at 5 years (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Function (overall) Various tools · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
Intramedullary fixation may leads to higher function or disability (overall) Various tools (Constant score and… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain ‐ using the section of Constant score Scale from 0 to 15; with 15 being the best positive score · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
It is very uncertain whether intramedullary fixation changes pain ‐ using the section of Constant score Scale from 0 to 15; with… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical healing ‐ time to clinical/radiographic fracture consolidation (weeks) · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
It is very uncertain whether intramedullary fixation changes clinical healing ‐ time to clinical/radiographic fracture… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events ‐ total of adverse events (various: mainly infection; cosmetic result ‐ e.g. prominent metalwork ‐ and symptomatic hardware) · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
It is very uncertain whether intramedullary fixation changes adverse events ‐ total of adverse events (various: mainly infection;… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life ‐ not measured · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Return to previous activities ‐ not measured · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Patient‐reported functional outcomes (pooled data) · individuals more than 18 years old with distal tibial metaphyseal fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes patient‐reported functional outcomes (pooled data) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Need for a secondary/revision operation or substantive physiotherapy for adverse outcomes (e.g. non‐union, malunion or infection) · individuals more than 18 years old with distal tibial metaphyseal fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes need for a secondary/revision operation or substantive physiotherapy… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Symptomatic non‐union or malunion, including limping 1 year · individuals more than 18 years old with distal tibial metaphyseal fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes symptomatic non‐union or malunion, including limping 1 year (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Pain (0 to 40: no pain) · individuals more than 18 years old with distal tibial metaphyseal fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes pain (0 to 40: no pain) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Wound complications including superficial/deep wound infection and osteomyelitis 1 year · individuals more than 18 years old with distal tibial metaphyseal fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes wound complications including superficial/deep wound infection and… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Fracture union 1 year · individuals more than 18 years old with distal tibial metaphyseal fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes fracture union 1 year (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review