Major bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in major bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in major GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major upper GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
It is very uncertain whether direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis changes major upper GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major lower GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
It is very uncertain whether direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis changes major lower GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major non‐GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
It is very uncertain whether direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis changes major non‐GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis probably leads to higher minor bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
It is very uncertain whether direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis changes minor GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor upper GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
It is very uncertain whether direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis changes minor upper GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor lower GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in minor lower GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor non‐GI bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis probably leads to higher minor non‐GI bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Deep vein thrombosis · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES may leads to higher total DVT compared with low‐dose heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Asymptomatic DVT · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES showed no clear difference in asymptomatic DVT compared with low‐dose heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic DVT · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES showed no clear difference in symptomatic DVT compared with low‐dose heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
PE · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
1 finding from 1 review
Total VTE · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
1 finding from 1 review
Bleeding (major and minor) · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic VTE · people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Vitamin K antagonists showed no clear difference in symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE) Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days compared with heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic DVT · people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Vitamin K antagonists showed no clear difference in symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal) Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days compared with heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic PE Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days · people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Vitamin K antagonists showed no clear difference in symptomatic PE Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days compared with heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major bleeding · people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Vitamin K antagonists may leads to higher bleeding ‐ major Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days compared with heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review