Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

821 questions · 842 findings · 96 reviews

No studies found 275 · 32.7%GRADE not reported 88 · 10.5%Very low 197 · 23.4%Low 187 · 22.2%Moderate 86 · 10.2%High 9 · 1.1%

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Major bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in major bleeding (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Minor bleeding (main analysis ‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis changes minor bleeding (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Thrombocytopenia (main analysis‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in thrombocytopenia (main analysis‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Probiotics vs other active intervention

Grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea · participants with cancer treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy)

Probiotics may leads to lower severity of diarrhoea: grade 3 or higher compared with other active treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Probiotics vs other active intervention

Requiring rescue medication for diarrhoea · participants with cancer treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy)

It is very uncertain whether probiotics changes requiring rescue medication for diarrhoea compared with other active treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy vs conventional laser/cryotherapy

Refractive error ‐ very high myopia ‐ at 30 months of age (unit of analysis: eyes) · preterm infants with type 1 ROP

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy may leads to lower refractive error ‐ very high myopia ‐ at 30 months of age (unit of… compared with conventional laser/cryotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention vs inactive control

All‐cause mortality Up to 28 days following admission · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality Up to 28 days following admission compared with inactive Control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Prophylactic trials: intervention vs inactive control

Arterial thrombotic events ‐ up to 30 days post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FIBRINOGEN: Prophylactic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in arterial thrombotic events Up to 30 days post‐operatively compared with inactive control (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

FXIII: Prophylactic trials: intervention vs inactive control

Arterial thromboembolic events Post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FXIII: Prophylactic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in arterial thromboembolic events Up to 5 to 7 weeks post‐operatively compared with inactive control (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review