What do systematic reviews say?

Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
  SoF row: Illustrative comparative risks '‐' / '‐'; no relative effect; Comments: 'Not reported'. Results: 'Our prespecified primary outcome (the duration of orthodontic treatment, number of visits during active…
  0 studies
  No studies found

Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Results: 'Our prespecified secondary outcomes of patient satisfaction, improvement in occlusion, and prolonged stability of treatment were not measured in the trials.'
  0 studies
  No studies found

Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Results: 'Our prespecified secondary outcomes of patient satisfaction, improvement in occlusion, and prolonged stability of treatment were not measured in the trials.'
  0 studies
  No studies found

Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically… may leads to higher rate of tooth movement (orthodontic tooth movement in mm at 3 months) compared with conventional treatment: fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment… (low certainty).

• Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes

  3 months
  MD 2.03 [1.52, 2.54]
  2 studies · 31 participants
  Low
• Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes

  1 month
  MD 0.61 [0.49, 0.72]
  3 studies · 42 participants
  Low

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) vs general anaesthesia

• Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) vs general anaesthesia

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) showed no clear difference in apnoea/bradycardia occurring 12‐24 hours following completion of… compared with general anaesthesia (moderate certainty).

• Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.72 [0.48, 1.06]
  4 studies · 138 participants
  Moderate

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) vs general anaesthesia

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) showed no clear difference in any oxygen desaturation occurring 12‐24 hours following completion… compared with general anaesthesia (moderate certainty).

• Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.82 [0.61, 1.11]
  2 studies · 48 participants
  Moderate

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) vs general anaesthesia

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) showed no clear difference in use of post‐operative respiratory support compared with general anaesthesia (low certainty).

• Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.09 [0.01, 1.64]
  3 studies · 98 participants
  Low

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) vs general anaesthesia

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) probably leads to lower post‐operative apnoea with preoperative sedatives excluded compared with general anaesthesia (moderate certainty).

• Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.53 [0.34, 0.82]
  4 studies · 129 participants
  Moderate

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) vs general anaesthesia

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) may leads to higher anaesthetic agent failure compared with general anaesthesia (low certainty).

• Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 7.83 [1.51, 40.58]
  3 studies · 92 participants
  Low

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) vs general anaesthesia

Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) showed no clear difference in anaesthetic placement failure compared with general anaesthesia (low certainty).

• Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 7.38 [0.98, 55.52]
  3 studies · 90 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 123 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 10 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  77 studies · 8293 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  62 studies · 7283 participants
  Low