Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,372 questions · 3,874 findings · 666 reviews

No studies found 431 · 11.1%GRADE not reported 783 · 20.2%Very low 995 · 25.7%Low 909 · 23.5%Moderate 596 · 15.4%High 160 · 4.1%

Personal protective equipment (PPE) types: powered, air‐purifying respirator (PAPR) plus coverall vs N95 mask plus gown

Any contamination fluorescent marker · healthcare worker volunteers

It is very uncertain whether personal protective equipment (PPE) types: powered, air‐purifying… changes any contamination: fluorescent marker compared with N95 mask plus gown (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): sealed gown‐glove interface vs standard gown

Contamination: fluorescent lotion · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether modified personal protective equipment (PPE): sealed gown‐glove… changes contamination: fluorescent lotion compared with standard gown (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): sealed gown‐glove interface vs standard gown

Contamination: MS2 · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether modified personal protective equipment (PPE): sealed gown‐glove… changes contamination: MS2 compared with standard gown (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown ‐ easy to doff vs standard gown

Any contamination fluorescent marker · healthcare workers

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown ‐ easy to doff may leads to lower contamination: fluorescent marker compared with standard gown (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown ‐ easy to doff vs standard gown

Contamination: bacteriophage · healthcare workers

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown ‐ easy to doff may leads to lower contamination: bacteriophage compared with standard gown (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Personal protective equipment (PPE) types: powered, air‐purifying respirator (PAPR) plus coverall vs N95 mask plus gown

Compliance with guidance ‐ Noncompliance with donning guidance · healthcare worker volunteers

It is very uncertain whether personal protective equipment (PPE) types: powered, air‐purifying… changes compliance: noncompliance with donning guidance compared with N95 mask plus gown (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown with gown‐glove improvement vs standard gown and gloves

People with contamination · healthcare workers

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown with gown‐glove… may leads to lower people with contamination compared with standard gown and gloves (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gloves with tab vs standard gloves

Any contamination of hands · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gloves with tab changes any contamination of hands compared with standard gloves (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): mask plus tabs vs standard masks

Contamination of mask from hands · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether modified personal protective equipment (PPE): mask plus tabs changes contamination of mask from hands compared with standard masks (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): mask plus tabs vs standard masks

Contamination of head from hands · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether modified personal protective equipment (PPE): mask plus tabs changes contamination of head from hands compared with standard masks (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Procedures: doffing with double gloves vs doffing with single gloves

Contamination: virus detected ‐ All body parts · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination: virus detected ‐ all body parts compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review