Question · asked by 1 review

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown with gown‐glove improvement vs standard gown and gloves: People with contamination

Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown with gown‐glove… may leads to lower people with contamination compared with standard gown and gloves (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown with gown‐glove improvement vs standard gown and gloves
People with contamination · healthcare workers
Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown with gown‐glove… may leads to lower people with contamination compared with standard gown and gloves (low certainty).
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.45 [0.26, 0.78]2 studies · 50 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff
2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.