Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Every word you type has to appear somewhere in the question, and the closest matches are ranked first.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

10,375 questions in 429 reviews · Oral Health

current versions
No studies 1,344 · 13%Ungraded 6,832 · 65.9%Very low 1,228 · 11.8%Low 613 · 5.9%Moderate 290 · 2.8%High 68 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Chlorhexidine oral product (one formulation/concentration) vs Another chlorhexidine formulation, concentration or application frequency
Outcome NR · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs No treatment
Adverse events · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with… · 24 months, primary dentition
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
Both studies reported there were no adverse events.2 studiesUngraded
Orthodontic appliances (palatal crib) vs No treatment
Sucking cessation (long term) · Children with a non-nutritive sucking habit (digit or pacifier) · Long term (12 months or more)
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children (2015) · Cochrane
RR 5.81 [1.49, 22.66]1 study · 37 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Oral mucositis (severe) · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.20, 0.72]5 studies · 270 participantsModerate
Higher water fluoride concentration (fluoridated water; natural or artificial) vs Lower water fluoride concentration (concurrent control)
Dental fluorosis of aesthetic concern (Dean's Index, TFI, TSIF) · Populations of all ages (mostly children) exposed to drinking water with differing fluoride concentrations · Cross-sectional
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
OR 2.90 [2.05, 4.10]40 studies · 59630 participantsLow
Repositioning of ankylosed teeth after osteotomy followed or not by distraction osteogenesis, or after luxation vs Conventional orthodontic treatment or follow-up with no specific treatment for ankylosis
Outcome NR · Any patient with ankylosis and displacement of permanent front teeth diagnosed by clinical and radiographic…
Interventions for treating traumatised ankylosed permanent front teeth (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs High-dose leucovorin rinse
Oral mucositis (severe) · Patients with osteosarcoma (bone cancer) receiving high-dose methotrexate, vincristine and leucovorin
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Oral mucositis (severe). Not estimable - no participants had developed severe oral mucositis by the fourth day after chemotherapy when the data were reported (Zhang 2011, Analysis 4.3, subgroup 3.2); 81 participants in…1 study · 81 participantsUngraded
Xylitol sucking tablets (1 g/day) vs No treatment
Number of infants with a caries increment · Infants/young children (primary teeth; baseline about 1 to 3 years) · 18 months (24-month follow-up)
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.72 [0.35, 1.45]1 study · 118 participantsUngraded
Parasympathomimetic drugs (choline esters, cholinesterase inhibitors) vs No treatment
Outcome NR · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Palatal arch vs Palatal crib (alternative orthodontic appliance)
Sucking cessation (short term) · Children with a non-nutritive sucking habit (digit or pacifier) · Short term (less than 12 months)
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.13 [0.03, 0.59]1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Cost · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
The studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months, Gastrointestinal complaints (lapatinib, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 15.53 [2.18, 110.55]1 study · 67 participantsUngraded
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months, Skin toxicity (erlotinib, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 6.57 [3.60, 12.00]1 study · 191 participantsUngraded
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Cost · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
The studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Skin toxicity/acneiform rash (cetuximab, all grades)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 6.56 [5.35, 8.03]2 studies · 1311 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Number of days of treatment with opioid analgesics · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment for solid cancers
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
No studies in the 5FU subgroup assessed the number of days of treatment with opioid analgesics.0 studiesNo studies
Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional treatment: fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment without surgical assistance
Duration of orthodontic treatment, number of visits during active treatment (scheduled and unscheduled) and duration of visits · Individuals of any age receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (braces) (people requiring orthodontic…
Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment (2015) · Cochrane
SoF row: Illustrative comparative risks '‐' / '‐'; no relative effect; Comments: 'Not reported'. Results: 'Our prespecified primary outcome (the duration of orthodontic treatment, number of visits during active…0 studiesNo studies
Non-specific immunotherapy (recombinant interleukin-2 or BCG cell wall preparation) plus standard therapy vs Standard therapy alone
Disease-free survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Recombinant interleukin-2 + surgery (De Stefani 2002)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
HR 0.66 [0.43, 1.02]1 study · 201 participantsVery low
Xylitol lozenges (5 g/day) vs Control lozenges (sucralose-sweetened placebo, no xylitol)
Caries increment (DFS) · Adults · 33 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
PF 0.08 [-0.03, 0.20]1 study · 669 participantsLow
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Progression-free survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Monoclonal antibody + chemoradiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy alone
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
HR 1.08 [0.89, 1.32]1 study · 891 participantsUngraded
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Quality of life · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Summary of findings 2 (melphalan/HSCT): Quality of life - '1 study assessed this outcome but the data are currently unavailable as the study report and analysis have not yet been completed' (Toro 2013; measured with…1 studyUngraded
Initiation of water fluoridation (artificial or natural) vs Low/non-fluoridated water (0.4 ppm fluoride or less)
Caries in permanent teeth (change in DMFT) · People of all ages in a community setting; the included caries studies were all in children aged 3 to 16 years · Follow-up 8 to 11 years
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
MD -1.16 [-1.61, -0.72]10 studies · 78764 participantsLow
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Adverse events: gingival bleeding · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Short term (up to 12 months)
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.69 [0.61, 4.66]2 studies · 226 participantsUngraded
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Satisfaction with treatment · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Satisfaction with treatment: listed in the Summary of findings table with no data; the studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Unacceptability of treatment (dropouts/exclusions during the trial) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger · During trial
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.89, 1.19]19 studiesUngraded
Endodontic therapy (surgical or non-surgical) performed with the aid of one or more magnification devices (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs The same endodontic therapy performed without magnification devices (without visual enhancers)
Quality of root-end filling (retrograde/surgical treatment) · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment
Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2015) · Cochrane
No included study assessed this outcome; the review notes that such secondary outcomes were only sporadically reported and were never statistically assessed.NRNo studies
Pacifier withdrawal vs No treatment
Outcome NR · Children with a non-nutritive sucking habit (digit or pacifier)
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children (2015) · Cochrane
There were no studies that looked at barrier techniques or pacifier withdrawal.0 studiesNo studies
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Control (no treatment or standard/usual oral care, e.g. saline rinse)
Adverse events · All patients with cancer who are receiving treatment · High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Adverse events reported narratively: one study did not report adverse events (Askarifar 2015); another reported no serious adverse events (Toro 2013); the remaining two reported low rates of shooting pain from the…3 studiesUngraded
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
Patient satisfaction and quality of life (any validated instrument) · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane
This outcome was not reported nor measured by the study. The abstract confirms no evidence was available for any secondary outcome.NRNo studies
Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs Low-dose leucovorin rinse
Oral mucositis (severe) · Patients with osteosarcoma (bone cancer) receiving high-dose methotrexate, vincristine and leucovorin
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Oral mucositis (severe). Not estimable - no participants had developed severe oral mucositis by the fourth day after chemotherapy when the data were reported (Zhang 2011, Analysis 4.3, subgroup 3.1); 118 participants…1 study · 118 participantsUngraded
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Pain · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Long term (12 months to 24 months)
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.15 [0.04, 0.67]2 studies · 312 participantsModerate
Fluoridated milk vs Non-fluoridated milk
Adverse effects: dental fluorosis · General population, irrespective of age or level of risk for dental caries
Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No evidence found. (Correspondence with the author (Maslak 2004) confirmed that no adverse effects were reported.)0 studiesNo studies
Glass ionomer sealant (with fluoride gel plus dentifrice) vs Fluoride gel plus fluoride toothpaste/dentifrice (non-invasive control)
Caries (lesion) progression (radiographic) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up), Glass ionomer sealant
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.13 [0.01, 2.52]1 studyUngraded
Endodontic therapy performed with one type of magnification device (surgical microscope, endoscope or magnifying loupes) vs Endodontic therapy performed with a different type of magnification device
Quality of root-end filling (retrograde/surgical treatment) · Patients of any age who received endodontic therapy and were followed up for at least 1 year after treatment
Magnification devices for endodontic therapy (2015) · Cochrane
No included study assessed this outcome; the review notes that such secondary outcomes were only sporadically reported and were never statistically assessed.NRNo studies
Xylitol syrup (high dose, 8 g/day) vs Control (low-dose xylitol, 2.67 g/day) syrup
Adverse effects (loose stools, diarrhoea) · Infants (primary teeth; baseline about 9 to 15 months) · 12 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
Adverse effects were not reported in a usable format, but the reported rates of loose stools and diarrhoea were very similar between groups. There were no serious adverse effects during the study. Milgrom 2009.1 study · 94 participantsUngraded
Cessation of water fluoridation (fluoride removed from the water supply) vs Continued fluoridated water
Change in proportion of caries-free children (deciduous or permanent teeth) · People of all ages in a previously fluoridated community (Maupome 2001: children with generally low caries experience)
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries (2015) · Cochrane
No evidence to determine the effect of the cessation of water fluoridation on the proportion of caries-free children.0 studiesNo studies
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs No treatment
Outcome NR · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Crown versus no treatment was a planned comparison (Comparison 2: crown versus no crown or filling). No study evaluated crown versus no treatment; the only study in this comparison (Santamaria 2014) used active…0 studiesNo studies
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Pain · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
Pain: No evidence available (Summary of findings 2).0 studiesNo studies
Oral cryotherapy for 30 minutes vs Oral cryotherapy for 60 minutes
Oral mucositis (moderate to severe) · Adults with solid cancers receiving fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.36, 1.30]1 study · 178 participantsVery low
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Time to restoration failure/retreatment · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane
The studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Non-specific immunotherapy (recombinant interleukin-2 or BCG cell wall preparation) plus standard therapy vs Standard therapy alone
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months, Nausea/vomiting (rIL-2, grades >=3)
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
RR 3.40 [0.15, 77.34]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Chlorhexidine varnish vs Placebo or no treatment
Adverse events (e.g. ulcers, tooth staining) · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with…
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
One study reported no adverse events for ulcers or tooth staining. One study stated "side-effects due to the CHX treatment were not noted".2 studiesUngraded
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib, gefitinib or lapatinib) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Progression-free survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 40 to 60 months
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
HR 0.80 [0.51, 1.28]2 studies · 271 participantsVery low
Xylitol candy (7.5 g/day) vs Control (sorbitol) candy
Adverse effects · Children (mixed dentition; baseline about 8 years) · 36 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
The authors reported that there were no adverse effects for either group. Honkala 2014.1 study · 252 participantsUngraded
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)
Participant satisfaction · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx · 24 to 70 months
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
No included studies addressed participant satisfaction (review-wide gap).0 studiesNo studies
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Mucosal irritation / oral soft-tissue allergic reaction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
None of the studies reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Orthodontic appliances (palatal arch/palatal crib) vs No treatment
Sucking cessation (short term) · Children with a non-nutritive sucking habit (digit or pacifier) · Short term (less than 12 months)
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children (2015) · Cochrane
RR 6.53 [1.67, 25.53]2 studies · 70 participantsLow
Pilocarpine hydrochloride (parasympathomimetic) vs Placebo
Other oral symptoms (oral discomfort, dysphonia) · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2015) · Cochrane
Both studies assessed oral discomfort and dysphonia (Johnson 1993; LeVeque 1993); pilocarpine reported to improve associated symptoms of salivary gland dysfunction (oral discomfort, dysphonia). No pooled data.2 studies · 278 participantsUngraded
Orthodontic appliances (palatal crib) vs No treatment
Occlusion (net change in overjet, short term) · Children with a non-nutritive sucking habit (digit or pacifier) · Short term (3 months)
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children (2015) · Cochrane
Table 1 (reduction in malocclusion), Villa 1997 (n=24), palatal crib vs no treatment: net change in overjet (mm) - no treatment 0.02; palatal crib -0.2; no statistically significant net change in overjet between…1 study · 24 participantsUngraded
Xylitol candy (7.5 g/day) vs Control (sorbitol) candy
Caries increment (dmfs, primary and permanent teeth combined) · Children (mixed dentition; baseline about 8 years) · 36 months
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults (2015) · Cochrane
One study (252 children) compared xylitol (7.5 g/day) candy with control (sorbitol) candy over 36 months. The data could not be used in analysis because the authors combined primary/deciduous and permanent teeth and…1 study · 252 participantsUngraded