Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

335 questions · 339 findings · 41 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 121 · 35.7%GRADE not reported 24 · 7.1%Very low 80 · 23.6%Low 58 · 17.1%Moderate 53 · 15.6%High 3 · 0.9%

SMP vs non‐SMP intervention

Global OA scores WOMAC. Scale from 0 to 240. Lower score is better. · patients with osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
98 participants
Moderate

SMP vs non‐SMP intervention

Function—Self‐reported Multiple tools3. Scale from 0 to 68. Lower score is better. · patients with osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
216 participants
Moderate

Quality of life measured on multiple scales (0 to 100; higher score = better quality of life) Postintervention: first assessment after end of treatment; no later than 3 months · patients with osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
226 participants
Moderate

SMP vs non‐SMP intervention

Withdrawals Losses to · patients with osteoarthritis

SMP showed no clear difference in withdrawals Losses to compared with non‐SMP intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.86 [0.69, 1.09]
919 participants
Moderate

SMP vs attention control

Pain Multiple tools4. Scale from: 0 to 10, 0 = no pain · patients with osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
575 participants
Low

SMP vs attention control

Global OA scores AIMS2 (average of physical, affect, and pain subscales). Scale from 0 to 10, lower better · patients with osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
251 participants
Low

SMP vs attention control

Function—Self‐reported Multiple tools3. Scale from 0 to 68. Lower score is better. · patients with osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
574 participants
Low

SMP vs attention control

Quality of life or psychological well‐being (higher = higher quality of life or psychological well‐being): end‐of‐intervention · patients with osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
165 participants
Low

SMP vs attention control

Treatment withdrawal · patients with osteoarthritis

SMP showed no clear difference in withdrawals compared with attention control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.11 [0.78, 1.57]
937 participants
Moderate

SMP vs usual care

Self‐management of OA Multiple tools1. Scale from 1 to 10, higher better · patients with osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 1706 participants
Moderate

SMP vs usual care

Positive and active engagement in life heiQ subscale for positive and active engagement in life. Scale from 1 to 6 (higher better) · patients with osteoarthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
357 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Treatment outcomes (Different measures) · CALD patients and their health professionals (Primary care settings in high income countries)

1 finding from 1 review

Cultural competence education for health professionals 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 27672 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Health behaviours · CALD patients and their health professionals (Primary care settings in high income countries)

1 finding from 1 review

Cultural competence education for health professionals 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 282 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Involvement in care (Mutual understanding) · CALD patients and their health professionals (Primary care settings in high income countries)

1 finding from 1 review

Cultural competence education for health professionals 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1092 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Evaluations of care (Different measures) · CALD patients and their health professionals (Primary care settings in high income countries)

1 finding from 1 review

Cultural competence education for health professionals 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 1952 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Health professionals knowledge & understanding (Awareness of racial differences) · CALD patients and their health professionals (Primary care settings in high income countries)

1 finding from 1 review

Cultural competence education for health professionals 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 87 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · CALD patients and their health professionals (Primary care settings in high income countries)

1 finding from 1 review

Cultural competence education for health professionals 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported

Self‐instruction and one‐to‐one counselling vs self‐instruction

Time to occurrence of new ulcer · s

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Computerised feedback and one‐on‐one consultations vs no feedback

Time to occurrence of new ulcer · individuals with spinal cord injury

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Computerised feedback and one‐on‐one consultations vs no feedback

Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · individuals with spinal cord injury

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found