evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,696 questions · 3,815 findings · 855 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 573 · 15%GRADE not reported 374 · 9.8%Very low 993 · 26%Low 1,062 · 27.8%Moderate 614 · 16.1%High 199 · 5.2%

TEXT LETTER PROMPT vs TEXT ORIENTATION STATEMENT

Did not attend appointment ‐ one day before appointment · people with severe mental disorders

It is very uncertain whether TEXT LETTER PROMPT changes did not attend appointment ‐ one day before appointment compared with TEXT ORIENTATION STATEMENT (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TEXT LETTER PROMPT vs TEXT ORIENTATION STATEMENT

Did not attend appointment ‐ three days before · people with severe mental disorders

It is very uncertain whether TEXT LETTER PROMPT changes did not attend appointment ‐ three days before compared with TEXT ORIENTATION STATEMENT (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Timer watch plus standard urotherapy vs urotherapy alone

Frequency of incontinence episodes · children aged 5 to 14 years with overactive bladder and at least one episode of daytime urinary incontinence per week

It is very uncertain whether timer watch plus standard urotherapy changes frequency of incontinence episodes at 3 months compared with standard urotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Timer watch plus standard urotherapy vs urotherapy alone

Resource implications (e.g. cost of incontinence management methods) · children aged 5 to 14 years with overactive bladder and at least one episode of daytime urinary incontinence per week

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and standard urotherapy vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with electromyographic biofeedback and standard urotherapy

Objective measurement of volume of incontinent episodes · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review