Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,747 questions · 3,943 findings · 594 reviews

No studies found 784 · 19.9%GRADE not reported 530 · 13.4%Very low 1,040 · 26.4%Low 981 · 24.9%Moderate 444 · 11.3%High 164 · 4.2%

CarieScan Pro device vs Reference standard (histology, excavation, or enhanced visual examination)

Sensitivity · Children, adolescents, or adults presenting asymptomatically or suspected of early enamel caries (in vivo), or extracted teeth of…
1 finding from 1 review
  • Electrical conductance for the detection of dental caries 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
    Up to 3 months between index test and reference standard (in vivo studies)
    CarieScan Pro (3 studies, 244 tooth surfaces): sensitivity ranged from 0.55 to 0.91. No evidence of a difference in accuracy by device type (Chi2=0.05, df=1, P=0.82).
    3 studies
    GRADE not reported

Electronic caries monitor (ECM) device (ECM II / ECM III / ECM IV) vs Reference standard (histology, excavation, or enhanced visual examination)

Sensitivity · Children, adolescents, or adults presenting asymptomatically or suspected of early enamel caries (in vivo), or extracted teeth of…
1 finding from 1 review
  • Electrical conductance for the detection of dental caries 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
    Up to 3 months between index test and reference standard (in vivo studies)
    ECM (4 studies, 475 tooth surfaces): sensitivity ranged from 0.61 to 0.98 (0.61-0.65 in three studies; 0.98 in the most recent ECM IV study). No evidence of a difference in accuracy by device type (Chi2=0.05, df=1,…
    4 studies
    GRADE not reported

Electronic caries monitor (ECM) device (ECM II / ECM III / ECM IV) vs Reference standard (histology, excavation, or enhanced visual examination)

Specificity · Children, adolescents, or adults presenting asymptomatically or suspected of early enamel caries (in vivo), or extracted teeth of…
1 finding from 1 review

CarieScan Pro device vs Reference standard (histology, excavation, or enhanced visual examination)

Specificity · Children, adolescents, or adults presenting asymptomatically or suspected of early enamel caries (in vivo), or extracted teeth of…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cohort studies ‐ 1 dose · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention probably leads to lower cohort studies ‐ 1 dose (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cohort studies ‐ Jeryl Lynn strain ‐ household contacts · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention probably leads to lower cohort studies ‐ Jeryl Lynn strain ‐ household contacts (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐controlled case series ‐ encephalitis meningitis ‐ encephalitis meningitis risk period (0 to 90 days) · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention showed no clear difference in self‐controlled case series ‐ encephalitis meningitis ‐ encephalitis… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐controlled case series ‐ herpes ‐ herpes risk period (0 to 90 days) · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention showed no clear difference in self‐controlled case series ‐ herpes ‐ herpes risk period (0 to 90… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review