evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,372 questions · 3,874 findings · 666 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 431 · 11.1%GRADE not reported 783 · 20.2%Very low 995 · 25.7%Low 909 · 23.5%Moderate 596 · 15.4%High 160 · 4.1%

Prophylactic platelet transfusions with low‐dose schedule vs high‐dose schedule

Mortality from all causes up to 30 days from study entry · People with a haematological disorder

Prophylactic platelet transfusions with low‐dose schedule showed no clear difference in mortality from all causes up to 30 days from study entry compared with high‐dose schedule (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic platelet transfusions with low‐dose schedule vs high‐dose schedule

Number of participants with at least 1 clinically significant bleeding event up to 30 days from study entry · People with a haematological disorder

Prophylactic platelet transfusions with low‐dose schedule showed no clear difference in number of participants with at least 1 clinically significant… compared with high‐dose schedule (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chlorhexidine spray vs Placebo or no intervention (including routine care)

Outcome not reported · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Chlorhexidine toothpaste vs Placebo or no intervention (including routine care)

Outcome not reported · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) vs no treatment

Presence of new caries in the primary teeth · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or…

It is very uncertain whether chlorhexidine gel (0.12%) changes presence of new caries in the primary teeth compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chlorhexidine varnish vs placebo or no treatment

Pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction or costs · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Chlorhexidine chewing gum vs Placebo or no intervention (including routine care)

Outcome not reported · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Chlorhexidine varnish vs placebo or no treatment

Dental caries: dmfs increment (primary teeth) · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or…
1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

HIV incidence (observational studies) · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HIV incidence (person/years) compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

HIV prevalence · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HIV prevalence compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Herpes Simplex Virus 2 (HSV‐2) incidence (person/years) · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in herpes Simplex Virus 2 (HSV‐2) incidence (person/years) compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

HSV‐2 prevalence · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in HSV‐2 prevalence compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Two or more sexual partners in last year · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use showed no clear difference in two or more sexual partners in last year compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Use of birth control methods (condom use at last sex) · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use probably leads to higher use of condom during last sexual intercourse compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use vs usual care

Knowledge: condom can prevent STIs · low and high‐risk populations

Structural and community‐level interventions for increasing condom use probably leads to higher knowledge: condom can prevent STIs compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review