Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

958 questions · 991 findings · 123 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 177 · 17.9%GRADE not reported 25 · 2.5%Very low 230 · 23.2%Low 321 · 32.4%Moderate 185 · 18.7%High 53 · 5.3%

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems vs regular systems

Needlestick injuries · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel

It is very uncertain whether (RCT) Safe intravenous systems changes needlestick injuries compared with regular systems (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems vs regular systems

Incidences of blood contamination ‐ Active systems · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems may leads to higher incidences of blood contamination ‐ Active systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems vs regular systems

Incidences of blood contamination ‐ Passive systems · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems showed no clear difference in incidences of blood contamination ‐ Passive systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems vs regular systems

Incidence of blood leakage ‐ Active systems · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems may leads to lower incidence of blood leakage ‐ Active systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review