Cochrane · systematic review · CD011358

Magnesium for treating sickle cell disease

Than, NN, Soe, HHK, Palaniappan, SK, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 21.4%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 7 · 50%Moderate 4 · 28.6%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Intravenous magnesium sulphate versus placebo for treating sickle cell disease

Population: people with sickle cell disease
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in frequency of vaso‐occlusive painful crises (as measured by pain diary of days with significant pain)
Intravenous magnesium sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 104 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
HRQoL score (Child‐reported PedsQL generic scale) at 1 week
Intravenous magnesium sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 202 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
HRQoL score (Child‐reported PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale) at 1 week
Intravenous magnesium sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 202 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
HRQoL score (Child‐reported PedsQL sickle cell disease module) at 1 week
Intravenous magnesium sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 202 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Length of hospital stay (hours)
Intravenous magnesium sulphate vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 104 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse effects: hypotension
Intravenous magnesium sulphate vs placebo
RR 2.57 [0.5, 13.08]2 studies · 306 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse effects: warmth at infusion site
Intravenous magnesium sulphate vs placebo
RR 13.26 [3.23, 54.4]1 study · 202 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Oral magnesium pidolate versus placebo/no intervention for treating sickle cell disease

Population: people with sickle cell disease
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in frequency of vaso‐occlusive painful crises (as measured by pain diary days with significant pain)
Oral magnesium pidolate vs placebo/no intervention
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life
Oral magnesium pidolate vs placebo/no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Length of hospital stay
Oral magnesium pidolate vs placebo/no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in dense red cells in sickle cell disease
Oral magnesium pidolate vs placebo/no intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Effects of K‐Cl cotransport red cell K+ and Mg2+ content (RBC magnesium) mM/kg Hb
Oral magnesium pidolate vs placebo/no intervention
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsModerate
Adverse events: diarrhoea and headache
Oral magnesium pidolate vs placebo/no intervention
no estimate extracted1 study · 12 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events: including serious adverse events, vaso‐occlusive crisis, gastrointestinal disorder, headache or migraine, upper respiratory tract infection, rash
Oral magnesium pidolate vs placebo/no intervention
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias