Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

436 questions · 451 findings · 96 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 31 · 6.9%GRADE not reported 17 · 3.8%Very low 149 · 33%Low 130 · 28.8%Moderate 103 · 22.8%High 21 · 4.7%

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

Balance ( · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 246 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

Gait velocity Immediate outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
14 studies · 1126 participants
High

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

ADL outcome · people with stroke

2 findings from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 186 participants
Low
Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 451 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.1.3 Includes musculoskeletal versus does not include musculoskeletal Independence in ADL scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 103 participants
Low

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.1 Includes functional training versus does not include functional training Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 188 participants
Low

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.2 Includes neurophysiological versus does not include neurophysiological Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 506 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.3 Includes musculoskeletal versus does not include musculoskeletal Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 81 participants
Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Motor function scales Immediate outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
25 studies · 4558 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Balance ( · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Gait velocity Immediate outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 292 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Knowledge (Single intervention) [mean number of correct questionnaire responses, assessed immediately post‐intervention] · People with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real clinical trial participation (across a range of topic areas)

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 155 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Knowledge ‐ continuous [mean number of correct questionnaire responses, measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition (or pregnant) considering real clinical trial participation (across a range of topic areas)

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 143 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Knowledge ‐ dichotomous [> 80% of knowledge questions correct, measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition (or pregnant) considering real clinical trial participation (across a range of topic areas)

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 290 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Rate of participation [case notes or questionnaire, measured immediately or up to four weeks post‐intervention] · people with a health condition (or pregnant) considering real clinical trial participation (across a range of topic areas)

The intervention may leads to lower rate of participation [case notes or questionnaire, measured… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 258 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Anxiety (or other psychological stress) [Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety score, measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition (or pregnant) considering real clinical trial participation (across a range of topic areas)

The intervention may leads to lower anxiety (or other psychological stress) [Spielberger State and Trait… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 142 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Knowledge [questionnaire (scored out of 80), measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real or hypothetical clinical trial participation in cancer or psychiatric…

The intervention may leads to lower knowledge [questionnaire (scored out of 80), measured immediately… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 93 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Knowledge [scored correct answer to single question, measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real or hypothetical clinical trial participation in cancer or psychiatric…

The intervention showed no clear difference in knowledge [scored correct answer to single question, measured… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.17 [0.96, 1.43]
1 study · 49 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Satisfaction with the information provided [single question, measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real or hypothetical clinical trial participation in cancer or psychiatric…

The intervention may leads to higher satisfaction with the information provided [single question,… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.3 [1.24, 8.78]
1 study · 44 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Knowledge (Multi‐component intervention) [mean number of correct questionnaire responses, assessed immediately post‐intervention] · People with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real clinical trial participation (across a range of topic areas)

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 126 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Rate of participation [case notes, measured immediately post‐intervention] · people with a health condition or nominally 'well' considering real or hypothetical clinical trial participation in cancer or psychiatric…

The intervention showed no clear difference in rate of participation [case notes, measured immediately… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.41 [0.13, 1.33]
1 study · 49 participants
Low