Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

704 questions · 710 findings · 81 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 227 · 32%GRADE not reported 38 · 5.4%Very low 178 · 25.1%Low 178 · 25.1%Moderate 80 · 11.3%High 9 · 1.3%

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

All‐cause mortality (main analysis ‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Recurrent venous thromboembolism (main analysis ‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis probably leads to lower recurrent venous thromboembolism (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Major bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in major bleeding (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Minor bleeding (main analysis ‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis changes minor bleeding (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Thrombocytopenia (main analysis‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in thrombocytopenia (main analysis‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Probiotics vs other active intervention

Grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea · participants with cancer treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy)

Probiotics may leads to lower severity of diarrhoea: grade 3 or higher compared with other active treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Probiotics vs other active intervention

Requiring rescue medication for diarrhoea · participants with cancer treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy)

It is very uncertain whether probiotics changes requiring rescue medication for diarrhoea compared with other active treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy vs conventional laser/cryotherapy

Refractive error ‐ very high myopia ‐ at 30 months of age (unit of analysis: eyes) · preterm infants with type 1 ROP

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy may leads to lower refractive error ‐ very high myopia ‐ at 30 months of age (unit of… compared with conventional laser/cryotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention vs inactive control

All‐cause mortality Up to 28 days following admission · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FIBRINOGEN: Therapeutic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality Up to 28 days following admission compared with inactive Control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FIBRINOGEN: Prophylactic trials: intervention vs inactive control

Arterial thrombotic events ‐ up to 30 days post‐operatively · the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

FIBRINOGEN: Prophylactic trials: intervention showed no clear difference in arterial thrombotic events Up to 30 days post‐operatively compared with inactive control (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review