Cochrane · systematic review · CD013143

Aquablation of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Hwang, EC, Jung, JH, Borofsky, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

UrologyAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 66.7%Low 1 · 16.7%Moderate 1 · 16.7%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Aquablation compared to transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Population: men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Urologic symptom scores
Aquablation vs transurethral resection of the prostate
no estimate extracted1 study · 174 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life
Aquablation vs transurethral resection of the prostate
no estimate extracted1 study · 174 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Major adverse events
Aquablation vs transurethral resection of the prostate
RR 0.84 [0.31, 2.26]1 study · 181 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Retreatment
Aquablation vs transurethral resection of the prostate
RR 1.68 [0.18, 15.83]1 study · 181 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Erectile function (sexually active men only)
Aquablation vs transurethral resection of the prostate
no estimate extracted1 study · 64 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Ejaculatory function (sexually active men only)
Aquablation vs transurethral resection of the prostate
no estimate extracted1 study · 121 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision