Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,072 questions · 4,237 findings · 447 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 946 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 257 · 6.1%Very low 1,121 · 26.5%Low 1,207 · 28.5%Moderate 568 · 13.4%High 138 · 3.3%

Direct trocar entry vs Veress needle entry

Solid organ injury · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

It is very uncertain whether direct trocar entry changes solid organ injury compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct trocar entry vs Veress needle entry

Failed entry · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

Direct trocar entry probably leads to lower failed entry compared with veress needle entry (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct trocar entry vs Veress needle entry

Vascular injury (major vessels and abdominal wall vessels) · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

It is very uncertain whether direct trocar entry changes vascular injury (major vessels and abdominal wall vessels) compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct trocar entry vs Veress needle entry

Visceral injury (bladder or bowel) · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

It is very uncertain whether direct trocar entry changes visceral injury (bladder or bowel) compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Patient readmissions · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Patient attendances at the ED · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Length of stay · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Patients with pressure ulcers · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Nursing‐staff turnover · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Patient mortality · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Enrolment · adults (age 18 years or over) with myocardial infarction, stable angina, following coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous…

The intervention may leads to higher enrolment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review