Percutaneous insertion vs open surgery: Catheter removal or replacement
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous insertion changes catheter removal or replacement compared with open surgery (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Percutaneous insertion vs open surgery Catheter removal or replacement · chronic peritoneal dialysis patients It is very uncertain whether percutaneous insertion changes catheter removal or replacement compared with open surgery (very low certainty). Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing catheter‐related infections in chronic… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.24 [0.03, 2.04] | 1 study · 61 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing catheter‐related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.