Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,721 questions · 19,640 findings · 2,039 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 3,754 · 19.1%GRADE not reported 1,273 · 6.5%Very low 4,859 · 24.7%Low 5,568 · 28.4%Moderate 3,240 · 16.5%High 946 · 4.8%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Routine vaginal examination vs vaginal examinations

Augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies) · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

Routine vaginal examinations may leads to higher augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: 204(1 RCT) compared with vaginal examinations (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examination vs vaginal examinations

Spontaneous vaginal birth · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

Routine vaginal examinations showed no clear difference in spontaneous vaginal birth (primary outcome)№ of participants: 204(1… compared with vaginal examinations (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examination vs vaginal examinations

Chorioamnionitis · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

Routine vaginal examinations showed no clear difference in chorioamnionitis (primary outcome)№ of participants: 204(1 RCT) compared with vaginal examinations (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examination vs vaginal examinations

Neonatal infection · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

Routine vaginal examinations showed no clear difference in neonatal infection (primary outcome)№ of participants: 204(1 RCT) compared with vaginal examinations (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examination vs vaginal examinations

Admission to NICU (primary outcome)№ of participants: 204(1 RCT) · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term

Routine vaginal examinations showed no clear difference in admission to NICU (primary outcome)№ of participants: 204(1 RCT) compared with vaginal examinations (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine vaginal examination vs routine rectal examination

Augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies) · pregnant women in labour at term

It is very uncertain whether routine vaginal examination changes augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: 307(1 RCT) compared with routine rectal examination (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Full opioid agonists vs different full opioid agonists or partial opioid agonists (methadone versus buprenorphine)

Illicit opioid use · pharmaceutical opioid dependent people

Full opioid agonists showed no clear difference in illicit opioid use compared with different full opioid agonists or partial opioid agonists (methadone… (moderate certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Full or partial opioid agonist maintenance vs placebo, detoxification only or psychological treatment (buprenorphine maintenance compared to taper or treatment

Adverse events · pharmaceutical opioid dependent people

It is very uncertain whether full or partial opioid agonist maintenance changes adverse events compared with placebo, detoxification only or psychological treatment… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Full opioid agonists vs different full opioid agonists or partial opioid agonists (methadone versus buprenorphine)

Retention [ · pharmaceutical opioid dependent people

Full opioid agonists may leads to higher retention compared with different full opioid agonists or partial opioid agonists (methadone… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review