Question · asked by 1 review
Routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations vs routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations: Maternal pain (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies)
- Population
- primiparous pregnant women in labour at term
- Intervention
- Routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations
- Comparison
- routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations
- Outcome
- Maternal pain (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Routine 4‐hourly vaginal examinations vs routine 2‐hourly vaginal examinations Maternal pain (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies) · primiparous pregnant women in labour at term The review found no eligible studies for this question. Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes… (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.