Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,112 questions in 171 reviews · Eyes and Vision

current versions
No studies 587 · 27.8%Ungraded 95 · 4.5%Very low 446 · 21.1%Low 557 · 26.4%Moderate 361 · 17.1%High 66 · 3.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification plus viscogonioplasty
Mean IOP change from baseline to 12 months (mmHg) · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma
Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted91 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Disease progression · adults with PACS, PAC or PACG
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Additional medications required · adults with PACS or PAC, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Complications · adults with PACS or PAC, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Further surgical or laser interventions · adults with PACS or PAC, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Quality of life measures · adults with PACS or PAC, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Anterior chamber morphology · adults with PACS or PAC, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Disease progressionAssessed by: dilated assessment of the vertical C/D ratio using a 78 D lens · adults with PAC or PACG, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsLow
Intervention NR
IOP · adults with PAC or PACG, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Additional medications required · adults with PAC or PACG, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Complications · adults with PAC or PACG, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Further surgical or laser interventions · adults with PAC or PACG, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsLow
Intervention NR
IOP · adults with PACS, PAC or PACG
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 174 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Quality of life measures · adults with PAC or PACG, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Anterior chamber morphology · adults with PAC or PACG, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Additional medications required · adults with PACS, PAC or PACG
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 126 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Complications · adults with PACS, PAC or PACG
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 206 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Further surgical or laser interventions · adults with PACS, PAC or PACG
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 126 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Quality of life measures · adults with PACS, PAC or PACG
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Anterior chamber morphology · adults with PACS, PAC or PACG
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Disease progression · adults with PACS or PAC, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
IOP · adults with PACS or PAC, and previous PI
Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Pneumatic retinopexy vs scleral buckle
Reattachment of the retina at 6–12 months · people with simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.81, 1.02]NRLow
Pneumatic retinopexy vs scleral buckle
Recurrence of retinal detachment at 6–12 months · people with simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.7 [0.97, 2.98]NRLow
Pneumatic retinopexy vs scleral buckle
Mean change in BCVA at 12 months from baseline · people with simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRLow
Pneumatic retinopexy vs scleral buckle
Proportion of eyes with final BCVA 20/40 or better at 6 months · people with simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.31 [1.04, 1.65]NRLow
Pneumatic retinopexy vs scleral buckle
Any operative ocular adverse event at 6–24 months · people with simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.55 [0.28, 1.11]NRLow
Pneumatic retinopexy vs scleral buckle
Quality of life · people with simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps
Failed trabeculectomy · patients with glaucoma
Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps
Failed trabeculectomy · patients with glaucoma
Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
Peto OR 0.36 [0.05, 2.61]1 study · 100 participantsLow
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps
Mean intraocular pressure · patients with glaucoma
Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
MD 0.862 studies · 139 participantsModerate
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps
Mean intraocular pressure · patients with glaucoma
Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
MD 0.444 studies · 247 participantsModerate
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps
Visual acuity loss:defined as: loss of visual acuity equal to or greater than 0.3 LogMAR · patients with glaucoma
Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps
Mean number of medications needed after surgery · patients with glaucoma
Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
MD 0.023 studies · 194 participantsHigh
Fornix vs limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps
Quality of life, assessed by vision‐specific questionnaires · patients with glaucoma
Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Phaco‐AIT vs Phaco‐Trab
Proportion of participants who were medication‐free (not using drops) at 12 months · participants 40 to 85 years of age with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
OR 2.33 [0.34, 16.2]1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Phaco‐AIT vs Phaco‐Trab
Mean change in IOP (mmHg) at 12 months · participants 40 to 85 years of age with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Phaco‐AIT vs Phaco‐Trab
Mean change in number of IOP‐lowering drops taken per day at 12 months · participants 40 to 85 years of age with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Phaco‐AIT vs Phaco‐Trab
Proportion of participants who required further glaucoma surgery at 12 months · participants 40 to 85 years of age with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
OR 31 study · 18 participantsVery low
Phaco‐AIT vs Phaco‐Trab
Rate of visual field progression · participants 40 to 85 years of age with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Phaco‐AIT vs Phaco‐Trab
Mean change in health‐related quality of life · participants 40 to 85 years of age with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Phaco‐AIT vs Phaco‐Trab
Proportion of participants experiencing intra‐ and postoperative complications · participants 40 to 85 years of age with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 participantsVery low
Sharp‐edged intraocular lens (IOL) vs round‐edged IOL
Nd:YAG capsulotomy at one year · people undergoing cataract surgery
Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.3 [0.05, 1.74]6 studies · 742 participantsLow
Sharp‐edged intraocular lens (IOL) vs round‐edged IOL
Posterior capsule opacification score at one year As measured by AQUA score, Evaluation of PCO (EPCO) score and other methods of quantifying PCO · people undergoing cataract surgery
Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract… (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 10 participantsModerate
Sharp‐edged intraocular lens (IOL) vs round‐edged IOL
BCDVA at one year, measured using logMAR score (range ‐0.3 to 1.3, low scores = better vision, a score of 0 is equivalent to 6/6 or 20/20 vision) · people undergoing cataract surgery
Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract… (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 153 participantsLow
Sharp‐edged intraocular lens (IOL) vs round‐edged IOL
Quality of life · people undergoing cataract surgery
Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract… (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Sharp‐edged intraocular lens (IOL) vs round‐edged IOL
Adverse effects · people undergoing cataract surgery
Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract… (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
Proportion of participants who were medication‐free (not using eye‐drops)at 24 months (medium‐term) · people with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno supraciliary microstent surgery for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.27 [1.09, 1.49]1 study · 448 participantsModerate
Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
Mean change in unmedicated IOP24 months (medium‐term) · people with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno supraciliary microstent surgery for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 448 participantsHigh
Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
Mean change in daily IOP‐lowering medicationsat 24 months (medium‐term) · people with open‐angle glaucoma
Ab interno supraciliary microstent surgery for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 448 participantsModerate