Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,793 questions · 1,866 findings · 339 reviews

No studies found 245 · 13.1%GRADE not reported 142 · 7.6%Very low 612 · 32.8%Low 513 · 27.5%Moderate 305 · 16.3%High 49 · 2.6%

Culturally adapted health literacy skills building course vs no/unrelated health literacy intervention

Health behaviour – Time point a: short‐term (up to 1 month post‐intervention) Multiple outcomes assessed and multiple measures used: (1) Fat‐related dietary habits Fat‐Related Diet Habits Questionnaire (score · migrants
1 finding from 1 review

Culturally and literacy adapted self‐management programme vs no health literacy intervention

Health behaviour 5– Time point a: short‐term (immediately post‐intervention) Multiple outcomes assessed and multiple measures used: (1) Blood glucose self‐monitoring 24‐hour recall, 3 questions on blood glucose self‐monitoring behaviour (2) Adhere... · migrants
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Oral classical immunosuppressants (prednisolone or cyclosporine) vs placebo

Short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of · adults with alopecia areata

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Oral classical immunosuppressants… changes short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Subcutaneous biologics (dupilumab) vs placebo

Short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of · adults with alopecia areata

Summary of findings table ‐ Subcutaneous biologics (dupilumab) showed no clear difference in short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Oral small molecule inhibitors (apremilast or baricitinib) vs placebo

Short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of · adults with alopecia areata

Summary of findings table ‐ Oral small molecule inhibitors… leads to higher short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of compared with placebo (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Oral small molecule inhibitors (ruxolitinib) vs oral small molecule inhibitors (tofacitinib)

Short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of · adults with alopecia areata

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Oral small molecule inhibitors… changes short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of compared with oral small molecule inhibitors (tofacitinib) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Topical small molecule inhibitors (ruxolitinib) vs placebo

Short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of · adults with alopecia areata

Summary of findings table ‐ Topical small molecule inhibitors… showed no clear difference in short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Contact immunotherapy (diphencyprone or squaric acid dibutil ester) vs placebo

Short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of · adults with alopecia areata

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Contact immunotherapy (diphencyprone or… changes short‐term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review