Safety of the programme (dropout, SAE) · Patients with outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Kidney injury (safety outcome) (hospital stay)
The intervention showed no clear difference in kidney injury (safety outcome) (hospital stay) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Vaccine safety · young, healthy men in a military facility
1 finding from 1 review
Safety of the intervention (adverse effects) · people scheduled to undergo lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Safety of systemic therapies for the treatment of AIMSS · health problem or population
1 finding from 1 review
Safety of systemic therapies for the treatment of AIMSS · women with early breast cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Fetal/infant mortality · women with singleton pregnancies at risk of cervical insufficiency
Cervical pessary showed no clear difference in fetal/infant mortality compared with vaginal progesterone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Fetal/infant mortality · women with singleton pregnancies at risk of cervical insufficiency
Cervical pessary showed no clear difference in fetal/infant mortality compared with cervical cerclage (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Fetal/infant mortality · women with singleton pregnancies at risk of cervical insufficiency
Cervical pessary showed no clear difference in fetal/infant mortality compared with no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Safety Any serious adverse event · heavy menstrual bleeding
Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in safety Any serious adverse event compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Safety Any serious adverse event · heavy menstrual bleeding
Endometrial resection/ablation probably leads to lower safety Any serious adverse event compared with unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Safety Any serious adverse event · HMB
Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in safety Any serious adverse events compared with open hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Provider response to IPV: safety planning, counselling and validation of survivors’ feelings · physicians/doctors, medical staff, medical students, residents, nurses and nursing students, dentists and dental students, counsellors and…
It is very uncertain whether training to respond to intimate partner violence changes provider response to IPV: safety planning, counselling and… compared with no intervention, wait‐list or placebo on healthcare providers'… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Procedural complications · DCM (non‐ischaemic)
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events · atopic eczema
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events · atopic eczema
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events not measured · atopic eczema
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse outcomes · atopic eczema
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to lower uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with vaginal dinoprostone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol probably leads to lower uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with vaginal dinoprostone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review