What do systematic reviews say?

Prehabilitation vs no prehabilitation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The intervention showed no clear difference in kidney injury (safety outcome) (hospital stay) (low certainty).

• Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes in adults 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.06 [0.96, 1.16]
  79 studies · 23103 participants
  Low

Virus vaccines vs placebo

• Vaccines for the common cold 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 2307 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise

• Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 188 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control

• Systemic therapies for preventing or treating aromatase inhibitor‐induced musculoskeletal symptoms in early breast… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  10 studies · 1250 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control

• Systemic therapies for preventing or treating aromatase inhibitor‐induced musculoskeletal symptoms in early breast… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 344 participants
  Very low

Cervical pessary vs vaginal progesterone

Cervical pessary showed no clear difference in fetal/infant mortality compared with vaginal progesterone (low certainty).

• Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.97 [0.5, 7.7]
  2 studies · 265 participants
  Low

Cervical pessary vs cervical cerclage

Cervical pessary showed no clear difference in fetal/infant mortality compared with cervical cerclage (low certainty).

• Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.38 [0.02, 7.93]
  1 study · 13 participants
  Low

Cervical pessary vs no treatment

Cervical pessary showed no clear difference in fetal/infant mortality compared with no treatment (low certainty).

• Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.93 [0.58, 1.48]
  5 studies · 1830 participants
  Low

Any of the interventions (CR, SE, SW, sealing with sealant materials, Hall Technique, or NRCC) vs Each other, placebo, or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
  None of the studies reported adverse effects.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Endometrial resection or ablation vs minimally invasive hysterectomy

Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in safety Any serious adverse event compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (moderate certainty).

• Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.75 [0.35, 1.59]
  4 studies · 809 participants
  Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy

Endometrial resection/ablation probably leads to lower safety Any serious adverse event compared with unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy (moderate certainty).

• Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.21 [0.06, 0.8]
  2 studies · 374 participants
  Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy

Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in safety Any serious adverse events compared with open hysterectomy (low certainty).

• Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.29 [0.32, 5.2]
  2 studies · 247 participants
  Low

Training to respond to intimate partner violence vs no intervention, wait‐list or placebo on healthcare providers' attitudes towards, knowledge of and readiness to manage IPV, referrals

It is very uncertain whether training to respond to intimate partner violence changes provider response to IPV: safety planning, counselling and… compared with no intervention, wait‐list or placebo on healthcare providers'… (very low certainty).

• Training healthcare providers to respond to intimate partner violence against women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 3.07 [0.96, 9.77]
  1 study · 29 participants
  Very low

Stem cell therapy vs peripheral therapy with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor

• Stem cell therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 60 participants
  Very low

NB‐UVB vs UVA1

• Phototherapy for atopic eczema 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 13 participants
  Very low

NB‐UVB vs PUVA

• Phototherapy for atopic eczema 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

UVA1 vs PUVA

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Phototherapy for atopic eczema 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

NB‐UVB vs placebo

• Phototherapy for atopic eczema 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 89 participants
  Low

Oral misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone

Oral misoprostol may leads to lower uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with vaginal dinoprostone (low certainty).

• Low‐dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.49 [0.4, 0.59]
  11 studies · 9084 participants
  Low