People with contamination · healthcare workers
Modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gown with gown‐glove… may leads to lower people with contamination compared with standard gown and gloves (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Any contamination of hands · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether modified personal protective equipment (PPE): gloves with tab changes any contamination of hands compared with standard gloves (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Contamination of mask from hands · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether modified personal protective equipment (PPE): mask plus tabs changes contamination of mask from hands compared with standard masks (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Contamination of head from hands · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether modified personal protective equipment (PPE): mask plus tabs changes contamination of head from hands compared with standard masks (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Contamination with fluor marker when using gowns · healthcare worker volunteers
1 finding from 1 review
Contamination with fluor marker when using aprons · healthcare worker volunteers
1 finding from 1 review
Contamination: virus detected ‐ All body parts · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination: virus detected ‐ all body parts compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Contamination: virus detected ‐ face · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination: virus detected ‐ face compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Compliance with guidance ‐ Noncompliance with doffing guidance · healthcare worker volunteers
It is very uncertain whether personal protective equipment (PPE) types: powered, air‐purifying… changes compliance: noncompliance with doffing guidance compared with N95 mask plus gown (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.5 [0.2, 1.23]
50 participants
Very low
Contamination: virus detected ‐ shirt · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination: virus detected ‐ shirt compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Contamination: virus detected ‐ pants · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination: virus detected ‐ pants compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Compliance with guidance ‐ Noncompliance: any error · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes non‐compliance: any error compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Contamination with fluorescent · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination with fluorescent compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
People with one or more errors · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether procedures: donning and doffing with instructions changes people with one or more errors compared with without instruction (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mean errors · healthcare workers
1 finding from 1 review
Fluorescence contamination · healthcare workers
1 finding from 1 review
Bacterial contamination: alcohol‐based hand rub · healthcare workers
Procedures: doffing with extra sanitation of gloves showed no clear difference in bacterial contamination: alcohol‐based hand rub compared with standard no sanitation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Bacterial contamination: quaternary ammonium · healthcare workers
1 finding from 1 review
Bacterial contamination: bleach · healthcare workers
1 finding from 1 review
Number of contaminated spots: trunk Fluorescent marker · healthcare worker volunteers
1 finding from 1 review