Procedures: donning and doffing with instructions vs No special instructions (control): People with one or more errors
It is very uncertain whether procedures: donning and doffing with instructions changes people with one or more errors compared with without instruction (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Procedures: donning and doffing with instructions vs without instruction People with one or more errors · healthcare workers It is very uncertain whether procedures: donning and doffing with instructions changes people with one or more errors compared with without instruction (very low certainty). Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.31 [0.11, 0.93] | 1 study · 120 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.