Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,447 questions · 2,590 findings · 266 reviews

No studies found 699 · 27%GRADE not reported 289 · 11.2%Very low 614 · 23.7%Low 605 · 23.4%Moderate 322 · 12.4%High 61 · 2.4%

Yoga vs an active intervention

Bothersomeness of symptoms at short term (6 weeks) Measured by the Overactive Bladder Symptom and Quality of Life‐Short Form (OABq‐SF) (lower = better) · women with urge‐predominant urinary incontinence
1 finding from 1 review

Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training

walking distance in m (at the end of study; all studies) ‐ Active control group (co‐interventions were similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. · people with Parkinson's disease
2 findings from 1 review

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) vs usual care

Physical function ‐ return to independent functional status at hospital discharge Defined as ability to perform 6 ADLs (bathing, dressing, eating, grooming, transferring from bed to chair, using the toilet) and walk independently, · critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) may leads to higher physical function ‐ return to independent functional status at… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) vs usual care

Physical function · critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults
3 findings from 1 review

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) vs usual care

Physical performance · critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults
4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) vs usual care

Adverse events Proportion of participants with one or more events, or proportion of intervention sessions where an event occurred (falls, accidental dislodgement of attachments, haemodynamic instability, oxygen desaturation or any other adverse ev... · critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults
1 finding from 1 review

Bioactive restorative materials (RMGIC and compomer combined) vs Resin composite restoration

Secondary caries · Patients requiring dental restoration; deciduous (primary) teeth

In deciduous teeth at 1 year, pooled bioactive materials (RMGIC and compomer) showed no significant difference from resin composite in secondary caries (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.07-4.10; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Active stimulation vs Placebo (sham/placebo device)

Pain intensity VAS (0 to 100; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain) · adults with chronic pain
3 findings from 1 review

Active stimulation vs Placebo (sham/placebo device)

Adverse event: lead failure/ displacement · adults with chronic pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Active stimulation vs Placebo (sham/placebo device)

Adverse events: need for reoperation/ reimplantation · adults with chronic pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Active stimulation vs Placebo (sham/placebo device)

Adverse events: infection · adults with chronic pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review