Question · asked by 1 review
Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training: walking distance in m (at the end of study; all studies) ‐ Active control group (co‐interventions were similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training walking distance in m (at the end of study; all studies) ‐ Active control group (co‐interventions were similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. · patients with patients with Parkinson's disease Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson's disease (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 385 participants | Low |
Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training walking distance in m (at the end of study; all studies) ‐ No intervention control group (co‐interventions were not similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. · patients with patients with Parkinson's disease Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson's disease (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 31 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson's disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.