Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,554 questions in 140 reviews · Heart

current versions
No studies 272 · 17.5%Ungraded 44 · 2.8%Very low 329 · 21.2%Low 464 · 29.9%Moderate 319 · 20.5%High 126 · 8.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Evolocumab vs ezetimibe and statins
Myocardial infarction · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.66 [0.23, 1.85]3 studies · 5003 participantsVery low
Evolocumab vs ezetimibe and statins
Any stroke · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 3899 participantsUngraded
Alirocumab vs placebo
All‐cause mortality · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.83 [0.72, 0.96]12 studies · 24797 participantsHigh
Alirocumab vs placebo
Myocardial infarction · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.86 [0.79, 0.94]9 studies · 23352 participantsHigh
Alirocumab vs placebo
Any stroke · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.73 [0.58, 0.91]8 studies · 22835 participantsHigh
Evolocumab vs placebo
CVD · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.84 [0.78, 0.91]3 studies · 29432 participantsHigh
Evolocumab vs placebo
All‐cause mortality · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
OR 1.04 [0.91, 1.19]3 studies · 29432 participantsHigh
Evolocumab vs placebo
Myocardial infarction · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.72 [0.64, 0.82]3 studies · 29432 participantsHigh
Evolocumab vs placebo
Any stroke · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.79 [0.65, 0.94]2 studies · 28531 participantsHigh
Alirocumab vs ezetimibe and statins
CVD · people at high risk of CVD (history of CVD or high LDL‐C despite treatment)
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane
OR 1.37 [0.65, 2.87]3 studies · 1379 participantsLow
mHealth education intervention vs usual care
Heart failure knowledge Analysis 1.1 · Adults with heart failure
mHealth education interventions in heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 411 participantsLow
mHealth education intervention vs usual care
Heart failure self‐efficacy Analysis 1.2 · Adults with heart failure
mHealth education interventions in heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 29 participantsVery low
mHealth education intervention vs usual care
Heart failure self‐care Analysis 1.3 · Adults with heart failure
mHealth education interventions in heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
MD 9.93 studies · 411 participantsVery low
mHealth education intervention vs usual care
Adverse events · Adults with heart failure
mHealth education interventions in heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
mHealth education intervention vs usual care
Health‐related quality of life Analysis 1.4 · Adults with heart failure
mHealth education interventions in heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 942 participantsVery low
mHealth education intervention vs usual care
Heart failure‐related hospitalisations Analysis 1.5 · Adults with heart failure
mHealth education interventions in heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.74 [0.52, 1.06]3 studies · 894 participantsLow
Mechanical assist devices vs intra‐aortic balloon pump
30‐day survival · people with acute cardiogenic shock
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.76, 1.35]5 studies · 162 participantsVery low
Mechanical assist devices vs intra‐aortic balloon pump
Quality of life · people with acute cardiogenic shock
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mechanical assist devices vs intra‐aortic balloon pump
MACE · people with acute cardiogenic shock
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 122 participantsVery low
Mechanical assist devices vs intra‐aortic balloon pump
Dialysis‐dependent · people with acute cardiogenic shock
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsVery low
Mechanical assist devices vs intra‐aortic balloon pump
Length of stay (hospital) · people with acute cardiogenic shock
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsVery low
Mechanical assist devices vs intra‐aortic balloon pump
Length of stay (ICU) · people with acute cardiogenic shock
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsVery low
Mechanical assist devices vs intra‐aortic balloon pump
Major adverse events · people with acute cardiogenic shock
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 122 participantsVery low
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Mortality from cardiovascular causes ( · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.88, 1.11]3 studies · 17676 participantsModerate
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Time to first hospitalisation for heart failure during · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Number of days spent in hospital due to heart failure during · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Rate of serious adverse events · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 270 participantsLow
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Exercise capacity · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 305 participantsLow
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Economic costs · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Mortality from cardiovascular causes · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 178 participantsLow
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Quality of life · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 179 participantsLow
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Time to first hospitalisation for heart failure during · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Number of days spent in hospital due to heart failure during · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Rate of serious adverse events · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 179 participantsLow
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Quality of life · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2102 participantsLow
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Exercise capacity · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 179 participantsLow
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Economic costs · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Mortality from cardiovascular causes ( · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Quality of life · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Time to first hospitalisation for heart failure during · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Number of days spent in hospital due to heart failure during · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Rate of serious adverse events · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Exercise capacity · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 171 participantsLow
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Economic costs · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Time to first hospitalisation for heart failure during · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Number of days spent in hospital due to heart failure during · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Rate of serious adverse events · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.92, 1]2 studies · 17399 participantsModerate
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Exercise capacity · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 158 participantsLow
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Economic costs · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 6558 participantsHigh
Usual care with ivabradine vs placebo, usual care, or no treatment
Mortality from cardiovascular causes ( · adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies