Cochrane · systematic review · CD011845
mHealth education interventions in heart failure
Allida, S, Du, H, Xu, X, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library
HeartAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 16.7%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 50%Low 2 · 33.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
mHealth education intervention compared to usual care in heart failure
Population: Adults with heart failure
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Heart failure knowledge Analysis 1.1 mHealth education intervention vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 411 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Heart failure self‐efficacy Analysis 1.2 mHealth education intervention vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 29 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Heart failure self‐care Analysis 1.3 mHealth education intervention vs usual care | MD 9.9 | 3 studies · 411 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Adverse events mHealth education intervention vs usual care | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Health‐related quality of life Analysis 1.4 mHealth education intervention vs usual care | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 942 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Heart failure‐related hospitalisations Analysis 1.5 mHealth education intervention vs usual care | OR 0.74 [0.52, 1.06] | 3 studies · 894 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |