Blood transfusion · treating kidney stones
It is very uncertain whether totally tubeless PNL changes blood transfusion MCID: 10 per 1000 compared with standard PNL (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Sepsis or fever MCID: 50 per 1000 · treating kidney stones
Totally tubeless PNL showed no clear difference in sepsis or fever MCID: 50 per 1000 compared with standard PNL (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Patient readmissions · treating kidney stones
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative pain (day 1) · treating kidney stones
1 finding from 1 review
Operating time · treating kidney stones
1 finding from 1 review
Length of hospital stay · treating kidney stones
1 finding from 1 review
Blood transfusion · treating kidney stones
It is very uncertain whether tubeless PNL changes blood transfusion MCID: 10 per 1000 compared with standard PNL (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Sepsis or fever MCID: 50 per 1000 · treating kidney stones
It is very uncertain whether tubeless PNL changes sepsis or fever MCID: 50 per 1000 compared with standard PNL (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Patient readmissions · treating kidney stones
It is very uncertain whether tubeless PNL changes readmission (first 30 days) MCID: 50 per 1000 compared with standard PNL (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe adverse events MCID: 50 per 1000 · treating kidney stones
Totally tubeless PNL showed no clear difference in severe adverse events MCID: 50 per 1000 compared with standard PNL (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative pain (day 1) · treating kidney stones
1 finding from 1 review
Functional independence · people with acute ischemic stroke
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in functional independence at 3 months (mRS 0 to 2) (primary outcome) compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b to 3) postprocedure · people with acute ischemic stroke
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b to 3) postprocedure compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality within 3 months · people with acute ischemic stroke
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intracranial hemorrhage on imaging at 24 hours · people with acute ischemic stroke
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in intracranial hemorrhage on imaging at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at · people with acute ischemic stroke
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months · people with acute ischemic stroke
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Primary patency ( · adults with ALI
1 finding from 1 review
Amputation · adults with ALI
It is very uncertain whether ultrasound‐accelerated thrombolysis changes amputation rate compared with thrombolysis alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major bleeding · adults with ALI
It is very uncertain whether ultrasound‐accelerated thrombolysis changes major bleeding compared with thrombolysis alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review