Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3,801 questions · 4,079 findings · 473 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 669 · 16.4%GRADE not reported 852 · 20.9%Very low 738 · 18.1%Low 903 · 22.1%Moderate 716 · 17.6%High 201 · 4.9%

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

HRQOL ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Participant‐assessed improvement in rosacea severity · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Low

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Proportion of participants with adverse event Pain as · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Low

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Physician‐assessed improvement in rosacea severity ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Assessment of erythema or telangiectasia · Participants with rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Moderate

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Lesion count ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Time needed until improvement ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pulsed dye laser vs intense pulsed light therapy

Duration of remission ‐ not measured · Participants with rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pulp-involved caries vs No pulp-involved caries

Body‐mass index z score (zBMI) · Children aged 1–6 years

The review reported lower body mass index-for-age z scores in children with pulp-involved caries.

1 finding from 1 review

The bi-directional relationship between growth stunting and early childhood caries: a rapid review. 2023 All outcomes
Vietnam · Pulp-involved caries
MD 1.18
1 study · 593 participants
GRADE not reported

Pulp-involved caries vs No pulp-involved caries

Mean weight‐for‐age z‐score · Children aged 1–6 years

The review reported lower weight-for-age z scores in children with pulp-involved caries.

1 finding from 1 review

The bi-directional relationship between growth stunting and early childhood caries: a rapid review. 2023 All outcomes
Vietnam · Pulp-involved caries
MD 1.17
1 study · 593 participants
GRADE not reported

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Pain · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Acute, subacute and chronic neck pain Intermediate‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in acute, subacute and chronic neck pain Intermediate‐term compared with mobilisation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 446 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs mobilisation

FUNCTION AND DISABILITY · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Acute and subacute neck pain Short‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Short‐term compared with mobilisation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 176 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Participant satisfaction · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Subacute and chronic neck pain Short‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in subacute and chronic neck pain Short‐term compared with mobilisation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 269 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Global Perceived Effect · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Acute and subacute neck pain Intermediate‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

Manipulation showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Intermediate‐term compared with mobilisation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 177 participants
Moderate

Manipulation vs mobilisation

Quality of life · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation vs exercise

Pain · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found