Question · asked by 1 review
Pulp-involved caries vs No pulp-involved caries: Mean weight‐for‐age z‐score
- Population
- Children aged 1–6 years
- Intervention
- Pulp-involved caries
- Comparison
- No pulp-involved caries
- Outcome
- Mean weight‐for‐age z‐score
The review reported lower weight-for-age z scores in children with pulp-involved caries.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pulp-involved caries vs No pulp-involved caries Weight-for-age z score · Children aged 1–6 years · Vietnam, Pulp-involved caries The review reported lower weight-for-age z scores in children with pulp-involved caries. The bi-directional relationship between growth stunting and early childhood caries: a rapid review. (2023) All outcomes | MD 1.17 | 1 study · 593 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| The bi-directional relationship between growth stunting and early childhood caries: a rapid review. 2023 All outcomes | Not specified (included studies published 2015-2020; inclusion window 2012-2020) | 9 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.