Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,410 questions · 8,901 findings · 1,091 reviews

No studies found 1,687 · 19%GRADE not reported 1,469 · 16.5%Very low 1,969 · 22.1%Low 2,060 · 23.1%Moderate 1,302 · 14.6%High 414 · 4.7%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Alvogyl vs no treatment

Pain (VAS) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
1 finding from 1 review

Primary dentition DMFT score over 13 vs No caries in primary teeth (DMFT = 0)

Caries prevalence in permanent dentition · School children and adolescents (6-18 years) followed from primary dentition (baseline examination before 72 months of age)

A primary-dentition DMFT over 13 is associated with about 15 times higher risk of caries in permanent teeth (single study; not GRADE-rated).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Hospital length of stay · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…

The intervention showed no clear difference in hospital length of stay (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Unscheduled readmission · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…

The intervention probably leads to lower unscheduled readmission (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Patient health status · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Satisfaction of patients, care givers and healthcare professionals · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes satisfaction of patients, care givers and healthcare professionals (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Healthcare resource use and costs · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes healthcare resource use and costs (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to 36), EMS (range 0 to 20), BBS (range 0 to 56), PPME (range 0 to 12), Koval (range 1 to 7). Higher values indicate better mobility (except MILA and Koval, where scale wa... · adults following hip fracture surgery

The intervention may leads to higher mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: MILA… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mobility scales, using EMS (range 0 to 20). Higher values indicate better mobility · adults following hip fracture surgery

The intervention showed no clear difference in mobility scales, using EMS (range 0 to 20). Higher values indicate… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: mPPT (range 0 to 36), POMA (range 0 to 30), SPPB (range 0 to 12), PPME (range 0 to 12). A higher score indicates better mobility. · adults following hip fracture surgery

The intervention leads to higher mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: mPPT… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s) and metres/minute (m/min). A higher score indicates faster walking. · adults following hip fracture surgery

The intervention leads to higher walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s)… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different functioning scales: FSQ (range 0 to 36), BI (range 0 to 100), AM‐PAC daily activity (range 9 to 101), COPM (range 0 to 20), LEFS (range 0 to 80), NEADL (range 0 to 66). A higher score indicates bette... · adults following hip fracture surgery

The intervention leads to higher functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different functioning scales:… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

HRQoL using EQ‐ 5D (range 0 to 1), SF‐36 (range 0 to 100), SF‐12 (range 0 to 100), and WHOQOL‐BREF (range 0 to 130). A higher score indicates better quality of life. · adults following hip fracture surgery

The intervention showed no clear difference in HRQoL using EQ‐ 5D (range 0 to 1), SF‐36 (range 0 to 100), SF‐12… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted · adults following hip fracture surgery

The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Mobility scales, using different scales: SPPB (range 0 to 12), PPME (range 0 to 12). A higher score indicates better mobility. · adults following hip fracture surgery

The intervention leads to higher mobility scales, using different scales: SPPB (range 0 to 12), PPME… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review