SaO 2 · neonates with mechanical ventilation
White noise showed no clear difference in saO 2 compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Behavioural indicators · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
— · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Physiological indicators · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Heart rate · neonates with mechanical ventilation
Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in heart rate compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
SaO 2 during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation
Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in saO 2 during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Behavioural indicators · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
SDB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation
Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in SDB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
SRB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation
Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch may leads to higher SRB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
— · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Change in burn‐related pruritus (VAS) ( · people with postburn pruritus
Doxepin cream showed no clear difference in change in burn‐related pruritus (VAS) ( compared with oral antihistamine (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Change in burn‐related pruritus (VAS) ( · people with postburn pruritus
Ondansetron showed no clear difference in change in burn‐related pruritus (NAS) ( compared with diphenhydramine (antihistamine) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · people with postburn pruritus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Pain · people with postburn pruritus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Change in burn‐related pruritus (VAS) ( · people with postburn pruritus
Enalapril ointment showed no clear difference in change in burn‐related pruritus (Scoring table for itching) ( compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · people with postburn pruritus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Pain · people with postburn pruritus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Change in burn‐related pruritus (VAS) ( · people with postburn pruritus
Massage therapy showed no clear difference in change in burn‐related pruritus Itching scale ( compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · people with postburn pruritus
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Pain VAS for pain ( · people with postburn pruritus
Massage therapy showed no clear difference in pain VAS for pain ( compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review