What do systematic reviews say?

Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry vs external tocodynamometry

Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).

• Internal versus external tocodynamometry during induced or augmented labour 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.04 [0.85, 1.29]
  3 studies · 1945 participants
  Moderate

Education, self‐monitoring plus education, and decision aids vs usual care

• Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 69 participants
  Very low

Education, self‐monitoring plus education, and decision aids vs usual care

• Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 587 participants
  Low

Education, self‐monitoring plus education, and decision aids vs usual care

• Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 587 participants
  Low

Education, self‐monitoring plus education, and decision aids vs usual care

• Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 721 participants
  Low

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention vs control

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention probably leads to lower incidence of delirium NH‐CAM compared with control (moderate certainty).

• Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.42 [0.34, 0.51]
  1 study · 7311 participants
  Moderate

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention vs control

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention showed no clear difference in mortality compared with control (moderate certainty).

• Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.88 [0.66, 1.17]
  1 study · 9412 participants
  Moderate

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention vs control

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention showed no clear difference in falls Fall events compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.03 [0.92, 1.15]
  1 study · 2275 participants
  Low

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention vs control

Single‐component medication monitoring and adjustment intervention showed no clear difference in hospital admissions compared with control (moderate certainty).

• Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.89 [0.72, 1.1]
  1 study · 7599 participants
  Moderate

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve… showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with treatment guided by clinical assessment alone? (low certainty).

• B‐type natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for heart failure 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.87 [0.76, 1.01]
  15 studies · 3169 participants
  Low

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve… showed no clear difference in heart failure mortality compared with treatment guided by clinical assessment alone? (low certainty).

• B‐type natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for heart failure 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.84 [0.54, 1.3]
  6 studies · 853 participants
  Low

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve… may leads to lower heart failure admissions compared with treatment guided by clinical assessment alone? (low certainty).

• B‐type natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for heart failure 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.7 [0.61, 0.8]
  10 studies · 1928 participants
  Low

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve… showed no clear difference in all‐cause admissions compared with treatment guided by clinical assessment alone? (low certainty).

• B‐type natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for heart failure 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.93 [0.84, 1.03]
  6 studies · 1142 participants
  Low

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

• B‐type natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for heart failure 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 1144 participants
  Low

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

• B‐type natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for heart failure 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 1051 participants
  Low

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

• B‐type natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for heart failure 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  8 studies · 1812 participants
  Very low

Follow‐up integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found