Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,783 questions · 10,022 findings · 882 reviews

No studies found 2,100 · 21%GRADE not reported 1,013 · 10.1%Very low 2,237 · 22.3%Low 2,514 · 25.1%Moderate 1,709 · 17.1%High 449 · 4.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

High‐pressure garment therapy vs low‐pressure garment therapy

Scar improvement (POSAS) (0–10, higher score = more severe scarring) · people with burn wounds likely to develop hypertrophic scarring
2 findings from 1 review

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy probably leads to higher specificadverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Specific adverse events: serious haemorrhage · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy may leads to higher specific adverse events: serious haemorrhage compared with chemotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Specific adverse events: serious thromboembolic events · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy probably leads to higher specific adverse events: serious thromboembolic events compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Adverse events: hypertension · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy probably leads to higher specific adverse events: hypertension compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐emptive antifungal therapy vs empirical antifungal therapy

All‐cause mortality · people with cancer who have febrile neutropenia

Pre‐emptive antifungal therapy showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with empirical antifungal therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐emptive antifungal therapy vs empirical antifungal therapy

Mortality ascribed to fungal infection · people with cancer who have febrile neutropenia

Pre‐emptive antifungal therapy showed no clear difference in mortality ascribed to fungal infection compared with empirical antifungal therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐emptive antifungal therapy vs empirical antifungal therapy

Proportion of antifungal agent use (other than prophylactic use) · people with cancer who have febrile neutropenia

It is very uncertain whether pre‐emptive antifungal therapy changes proportion of antifungal agent use (other than prophylactic use) compared with empirical antifungal therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐emptive antifungal therapy vs empirical antifungal therapy

Duration of antifungal use (days) · people with cancer who have febrile neutropenia

It is very uncertain whether pre‐emptive antifungal therapy changes duration of antifungal use (days) compared with empirical antifungal therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐emptive antifungal therapy vs empirical antifungal therapy

Invasive fungal infection detection · people with cancer who have febrile neutropenia

It is very uncertain whether pre‐emptive antifungal therapy changes invasive fungal infection detection compared with empirical antifungal therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term GnRH agonist therapy vs no additional therapy

Live birth rate · patients with endometriosis prior to standard IVF/ICSI

It is very uncertain whether long‐term GnRH agonist therapy changes live birth rate compared with no additional therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review